Source to three letters saying not to view the video?
Also, we are basically at the dawning of the era where "leaked video" can no longer be trusted. AI is getting too good, especially at mimicking common styles like "boardroom/congressional meeting", and that's just with what's publicly available. If it's a steady shot video, it's immediately suspect. And we're within ten, if not five years, of AI being able to create a convincing shaky handheld phone video.
Technologically, the last hundred or two years have been an historical aberration, one that is being self-corrected (in some ways) by the rapid increase of technology itself.
Source to three letters saying not to view the video?
Also, we are basically at the dawning of the era where "leaked video" can no longer be trusted. AI is getting too good, especially at mimicking common styles like "boardroom/congressional meeting", and that's just with what's publicly available. If it's a steady shot video, it's immediately suspect. And we're within ten, if not five years, of AI being able to create a convincing shaky handheld phone video.
Technologically, the last hundred or two years have been an historical aberration, one that is being self-corrected (in some ways) by the rapid increase of technology itself.
They can also clone as much blood as desired from a DNA sample, so "blood at the scene" can't be relied on either.