From the court’s filing rules: the only basis for rehearing is “intervening circumstances of a substantial or controlling effect or to other substantial grounds not previously presented.”

I’m not seeing either one being applicable. Clearly there are no “intervening circumstances” and it is implausible that Brunson has been deliberately sabotaging his case so far by holding back instead of submitting any “substantial grounds”.

So asking the same people that just rejected it to reconsider? Perfect.

2 weeks