Are we a bunch of hopium addicts who played ourselves? Have we been played by glowies laughing their asses off as we chase the laser pointer? Dozens if not hundreds of posts about the Brunson case this past month, and the few posters who correctly explained it was a procedural nothing burger were buried in an avalanche of opinions with no factual knowledge of the process. Yes, I bought into the hopium for a while.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (22)
sorted by:
The case was never going to be heard. Writ of Cert was never going to happen. Why> Because the SC cannot remove anyone from office. The Constitution is pretty clear that only Congress can. This is done by impeachments for the other branches, or removal of members of their respective houses. The court cannot do it. Also, the only redress the people have is elections to remove elected officials.
We do NOT want the courts to have the ability to remove elected officials. That is a dangerous, slippery slope.