This hour's breaking story (AS PREDICTED in censored thread) :
Hero Customer Who Shot Armed Robber At Houston Taco Joint Ordered To Face Grand Jury By Soros-Funded DA. : https://www.zerohedge.com/political/hero-customer-who-shot-armed-robber-houston-taco-joint-ordered-face-grand-jury-soros
Soros DA kept letting felon out on no bail, now, as predicted, is going to imprison the hero.
= = = = = = ==
The first and ONLY full video of the hero in a fast rising POPULAR thread was deleted mysteriously by a centrist-leaning gun-hating mod.
https://cdn.videy.co/Cwc0nakG.mp4
It WAS in this very fast rising +64 thread : https://archive.ph/Y9YvJ
= = = = =
Sordid details of this despicable act to bury 2 threads about this hero at the restaurant, is covered in this thread :
= = = = = =
Does Soros have influence on this site?
Yes. That’s exactly what I’m saying. Per the law.
Man pulls gun to rob
You shoot man
Man falls down
Man doesn’t move
—- threat over——
Call cops
If man moves for his gun, shoot man again
—- cross this line and go to prison———-
Shoot man 4 more times while immobilized
Recover man’s gun
Take one last shot at his head
The last shot was certainly iffy. But we don’t view this stuff in a vacuum with the benefit of hindsight and being able to watch the video over and over. This transpired over what…8 seconds?
2 part test: (a) did the shooter feel in imminent fear of death or serious bodily harm? (b) was the amount of force used “reasonable?”
The state has to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt. That means both elements. No question (a) is fine. It was a robbery. In (b) the use of force was perfectly reasonable until the last shot. Then it becomes sorta a grey area. You can’t really push that over the “beyond a reasonable doubt” line. Not in these circumstances and on this timeline. If he went back 30 seconds later and did it, different story. Here, while rather poor judgement, it would not reach the threshold required.