this is a very important distinction to make!
we are lead to believe that some babies just die, and then "doctors are baffled".
we are lead to believe that SIDS is maybe caused by a baby sleeping on their "wrong" side, which is, whichever side the baby happens to be sleeping on when they die.
"back to sleep" is just a way to obfuscate what SIDS really is...
vaccines kill babies. thats not a secret. even the CDC website, that lists all of the known adverse reactions for all vaccines, lists "death" as a possible risk
and yet, when vaccines actually do kill babies, they don't put "vaccine" as the cause of death.
they put "SIDS" as the cause of death,
which is really just a wink-wink covert way for medical staff to know and communicate that a baby has died of a vaccine, without saying the baby died of a vaccine.
"SIDS" is what they put as the cause of death, ONLY IF everything else EXCEPT vaccines, has been systematically ruled out.
they have no way to definitively "rule out" vaccines, as a cause of death.
and yet they always do "rule out" vaccines, implied by.... "SIDS!"
is it as clear as day to you now?
you have seen "SADS" (Sudden Adult Death Syndrome)
and you knew something was very fishy about SADS.
you have seen "Died Suddenly, Doctors Baffled" become a meme.
you have seen the media, and the government, and the medical establishment, and scientific establishment, et al
not only turn a blind-eye toward vaccine problems,
but actively try to push more people to get vaccines in spite of the problems.
and now they want to ask for "amnesty"? like they didn't know what they were doing?
the day that i found out vaccines caused SIDS...
i already knew that vaccines killed babies, i just didn't connect the dots until Kathy tried too hard.
but way beyond the already astonishing fact that vaccines can and do "cause" SIDS,
is the even more astonishing fact that they invented "SIDS" deliberately to cover-up the fact that vaccines kill babies!
https://i.redd.it/f0i2ui9l4yl41.jpg
http://twitter.com/search?q=SIDS+invented
http://twitter.com/search?q=SADS+invented
http://twitter.com/search?q=invented+SIDS+OR+SADS
https://twitter.com/search?q=handmadekathy%20SIDS&src=typed_query&f=live
this is the twitter account that got my twitter account banned.
at the time my twitter account was banned, this guy was primarily interested in banning all anti-vaccine accounts, and he seemed to have the power to do it himself.
so DO NOT mess with this guy. look but don't touch, or else your twitter account will get suspended.
we need to get a message to Elon Musk, that he needs to reinstate every account that this user banned,
and then ban this user for abusing Musk's platform.
https://twitter.com/thereal_truther
EDIT: from the comments below, is this link:
Vaccines and sudden infant death: An analysis of the VAERS database 1990–2019 and review of the medical literature
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214750021001268
Then there’s the vitamin K shot. Supposedly every baby born is vitamin K deficient leading to rare cases of hemorrhaging so give a 2000ug injection intramuscular to every baby when the recommended daily value is 2ug because it’s cost savings over vitamin k tests. However according to the cdc the mere suggestion that this ‘deficiency’ may play a biological role is ridiculous.
and Hep B shot on the day the baby is born?!
i have debated this with numerous pro-vaccine people, and of course they will fetch and parrot the best arguments available to them...
robots?
...
but anyway, their reasoning is very weak, and if we wanted to launch an attack on the credibility of the CDC vaccine schedule for children, this would be a great place to start.
because the entire premise of a baby needing a Hep B shot on the day they are born is absurd.
behaviors that increase risk of Hep B are having unprotected sex with prostitutes, and sharing dirty needles with druggies,
so we mockingly say that babies are not shooing up with hookers, so where is the risk of Hep B?
so, here is the official story on birthday Hep B.
in theory, its hypothetically possible for
a pregnant woman is Hep B+
the Hep B+ pregnant woman takes a Hep B test, BUT tests Hep B-
the baby is Hep B- before birth
during childbirth, the Hep B+ mother's blood comes in contact with the Hep B- babies blood, or other points of contact, or entry.
there exists a very small window of time, when a Hep B vaccine, will actually stimulate a faster, and stronger immune reaction to Hep B, than the Hep B virus infection itself.
never mind that this scenario is obviously absurd.
its the official story!
and if you ask WHY they done't just make a better Hep B tests for mothers,
they get all pissed-off about it, and start calling you an anti-vaccine conspiracy theorist.
and i'm just like, so why do we give EVERY baby a Hep B vaccine on the day they are born... instead of just testing every mother for Hep B before baby is born?
want to destroy their credibility? just hit them with the Hep B facts! get them talking about Hep B shots, because the more they talk, the more they expose their own zombie-like devotion to this vaccine cult.
Hold up, how on earth would the mother have Hep B but not the baby? Is that really their best explanation?
im not sure if a Hep B+ mother will always give Hep B+ to the baby,
but there again, if the baby is already Hep B+, why rush with the Hep B vaccine?