I'm not going to argue the validity of the moon landing with a close minded person who insulted me. I'm only interested in debating people who are beyond that pettiness. Otherwise we're both wasting our time
So you're saying NASA did take real photographs of the Earth during the Apollo missions but you don't want to say so because you don't want to validate the person who is name calling?
No they didn't take a picture because they never went and I wasn't about to argue that point with an ignorant rude close mined person. It's a waste of time.
I'm not going to argue the validity of the moon landing with a close minded person who insulted me. I'm only interested in debating people who are beyond that pettiness. Otherwise we're both wasting our time
So you're saying NASA did take real photographs of the Earth during the Apollo missions but you don't want to say so because you don't want to validate the person who is name calling?
No they didn't take a picture because they never went and I wasn't about to argue that point with an ignorant rude close mined person. It's a waste of time.
But doesn't that go to what the other dude was saying? That if every picture is fake then you can never be disproven?
You're asking the wrong question. If NASA has satellites with cameras why can they only give us CGI images?