Which US attorney’s office is doing this? You’re not gonna have a rico trial in multi district…you gotta pick one district. You gotta get a grand jury indictment in the district in which the crime occurred. That may include more than one district but you’re not having more than one trial.
SCOTUS would love sorting out the 6th amendment issue here about the district in which the crime occurred. There have been some cases with interstate drug transportation that brought defendants to trial in districts in which they had never been physically present. While questionably good decisions by the Court, they have very little factually in common with this type of case. And almost always the DOJ was forum shopping.
Which US attorney’s office is doing this? You’re not gonna have a rico trial in multi district…you gotta pick one district. You gotta get a grand jury indictment in the district in which the crime occurred. That may include more than one district but you’re not having more than one trial.
SCOTUS would love sorting out the 6th amendment issue here about the district in which the crime occurred. There have been some cases with interstate drug transportation that brought defendants to trial in districts in which they had never been physically present. While questionably good decisions by the Court, they have very little factually in common with this type of case. And almost always the DOJ was forum shopping.
u/MAGAdeburger
dasting question fren
It would seem that the answer is NONE.
A more logical process would be military tribunals.
If that were true, then said DOJ officials could be tied up in indictment as well (and likely so, if true).
🎯
https://youtu.be/q5pESPQpXxE
Valid points for sure…I guess we’ll have to trust that they are involving good lawyers. Something to follow - let’s see what happens.