I have tried to look at some of the "Q clock proofs" and honestly either I'm too stupid to see what they were trying to put together or it's just smoke/mirrors. Anytime I've looked into it I could NOT find anything simple or easy to follow (which is not the case with regular Q-proofs, e.g. No-Name, it doesn't get much simpler or more obvious than that). One would think if the Q Clock were legit there'd be a few obvious/easy proofs thereof - and yes it's possible I simply failed in finding them...dunno....
"except that isnt how delta time works"
Uh, considering that sites like Qagg in fact work that way when you do deltas, perhaps you should elaborate on this assertion.
Honest question, has the Q-clock ever netted anything useful?
It seems to be attempting to predict future events/actions, to which Q specifically said...
u/#q4964
I have tried to look at some of the "Q clock proofs" and honestly either I'm too stupid to see what they were trying to put together or it's just smoke/mirrors. Anytime I've looked into it I could NOT find anything simple or easy to follow (which is not the case with regular Q-proofs, e.g. No-Name, it doesn't get much simpler or more obvious than that). One would think if the Q Clock were legit there'd be a few obvious/easy proofs thereof - and yes it's possible I simply failed in finding them...dunno....
https://files.catbox.moe/snvuck.png
OK that is interesting. And very clear. TY.
Edit: I'd consider making it its own post btw.
Any downpooters actually going to explain what is wrong with my observation/question?