Immigration and Customs Enforcement's Homeland Security Investigations officers execute a criminal search warrant in Texas, in an August 2018 photo. (ICE/via Reuters
Why do they use 2018 photo then? Doesn't seem logical...
The article didn’t mention anything about underage people, so presumably the johns thought they were setting up meetings with legal-age sex workers. It turns out there were no real sex workers involved, it was just cops acting like it online. So the whole scenario just involves johns and law enforcement, but no sex workers or trafficking victims.
By targeting those involved in this crime, we hope to disrupt this activity and provide assistance to human trafficking victims by getting them connected to the advocates and resources they need”
said HSI Special Agent in Charge Lester R. Hayes, Jr.
The only “crime” was attempted online solicitation of prostitution. Since no real sex workers were involved, there were no trafficking victims to assist. This whole operation didn’t provide trafficking victims with any resources or help, because it didn’t involve those people at all.
Unless they can show that the johns were specifically requesting sex workers who were below legal age of consent, then this sting operation is pretty lame. Seems like a witch hunt or a DHS-sponsored propaganda campaign: ‘see, these American white men and black men in conservative regions are no better than the whore-loving Davos crowd.’
Why is this important when it happened in 2018? Am I reading it wrong?
...howls...
...the photo stock is from 2018....
https://twitter.com/tarrantcountyso/status/1616478957930414089
the story is from 1.20.23
Where do you see 2018? I see "By Jana J. Pruet January 25, 2023Updated: January 25, 2023"
https://www.fox4news.com/news/frisco-southlake-prostitution-sting-lewisville-marcus-coach-youth-pastor-46-arrested
Immigration and Customs Enforcement's Homeland Security Investigations officers execute a criminal search warrant in Texas, in an August 2018 photo. (ICE/via Reuters
Why do they use 2018 photo then? Doesn't seem logical...
Hide info of who and where so they can go up the chain still.
Makes sense, thanks
Also could be undwrage victims they want to hide. OPSEC would stop info release of ongoing or minors
Knuckle Puck time
...absolutely....
Knew the coach involved, gonna be a tough road for his family and would ask for support and prays for his wife and kids
If it doesn't involve kids or forced prostitutes I don't really care what people send their money on.
The article didn’t mention anything about underage people, so presumably the johns thought they were setting up meetings with legal-age sex workers. It turns out there were no real sex workers involved, it was just cops acting like it online. So the whole scenario just involves johns and law enforcement, but no sex workers or trafficking victims.
said HSI Special Agent in Charge Lester R. Hayes, Jr.
The only “crime” was attempted online solicitation of prostitution. Since no real sex workers were involved, there were no trafficking victims to assist. This whole operation didn’t provide trafficking victims with any resources or help, because it didn’t involve those people at all.
Unless they can show that the johns were specifically requesting sex workers who were below legal age of consent, then this sting operation is pretty lame. Seems like a witch hunt or a DHS-sponsored propaganda campaign: ‘see, these American white men and black men in conservative regions are no better than the whore-loving Davos crowd.’