4
MarkusCincinnatus 4 points ago +4 / -0

Under civil rights laws which never should have been codified because they’re violations of the right of free association, sex for jobs is penalized as workplace sexual harassment. It’s ridiculous, because the job seeker could just say ‘no deal’ and leave the lecherous employer with a smaller candidate pool. What is “ok” is difficult to determine because prostitution is ethical even if it’s sexually immoral. The “oldest profession” can be done mutually voluntarily where there is no need for the law to intercede. That’s not to say that the practice is advisable.

We are witnessing the END of the "casting couch"“

Yeah because they can just use AI actresses now. Hollywood whores have priced themselves out.

4
MarkusCincinnatus 4 points ago +4 / -0

You might not understand the trap they set. By sacrificing someone we don’t like such as Weinstein, they’ve paved the way to go after good guys such as Trump, Assange, Kavanaugh, etc

1
MarkusCincinnatus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Following a nearly two-month trial, Weinstein was convicted last month of raping an Italian model and actor after he barged into her hotel room.”

Barged in? Hotel room doors usually have an automatic lock when closed and often also have a peephole, a deadbolt, a swing bar door guard, and a chain. Notice the article doesn’t claim that he broke in, just barged in. That means according to her story, she opened the door for him.

‘I did not rape this woman. I did not see this woman. I wasn’t at the hotel,” Weinstein said.’”

He claimed his accuser, as a former actor, knew how to “turn the tears on” and said the woman’s allegation was the result of a “cottage industry” of lawyers who have made careers out of suing him. Jane Doe 1 filed a civil suit against Weinstein shortly after he was convicted.”

The evidentiary standard for criminal convictions is beyond a reasonable doubt, which means the judge has to be about 99-100% sure that the defendant is guilty. He-said-she-said doesn’t meet this standard. There simply isn’t enough evidence for a conviction. Even with the conviction overturned on appeal, in the meantime if Weinstein was sued in civil court, it would be difficult to recoup the award because civil suits have the much lower evidentiary standard of preponderance of evidence. That means the judge only has to be 51% convinced of guilt.

7
MarkusCincinnatus 7 points ago +12 / -5

actual rapist like Weinstein“

Weinstein might be a rapist but we don’t know for sure because it’s never been proven, so we should refrain from calling him that in the spirit of ‘innocent until proven guilty.’ What he was convicted of was ridiculous and it never should have been ruled that way, which is why it’s right to overturn it on appeal. The “victim” was his girlfriend of several years who admitted to multiple occasions of consensual sex with Weinstein before and after the alleged rape event. Really, she just picked an occasion somewhere out of the middle and retroactively withdrew her consent from that one time. Witch hunt tactic.

Weinstein is an unsavory Hollywood jew. He was a mainstay on the casting couch, but those aspiring actresses consented voluntarily. They could’ve said ‘no, I don’t need the acting part that badly’, but they whored themselves instead. Then when they get older and the acting offers decline, they regret their business decision and decide that it was rape. It’s BS.

Global marxists have been attacking western birthrates for years, and one of their weapons has been feminism. Feminists are using a dislikable, unsavory character such as Weinstein to set a precedent for criminalizing male sexuality. The Weinstein conviction means that any other man can have a consensual event from his past retroactively redefined on the whim of an accuser with ulterior motives. That is unjust, and it places a dangerous weapon in the hands of globalists to remove almost anyone from society.

6
MarkusCincinnatus 6 points ago +6 / -0

Xcellently Xplained. That’s what I’ve been doing.

The lady in the video is great, but even calling a transvestite XY a “fake woman” is still using the word “woman”.

1
MarkusCincinnatus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Leftism is often passive-aggressive. Largely, it is using the government to coerce one’s socioeconomic rivals. For example, advocating for the IRS to commit armed robbery of competitors. The passive-aggressive leftist doesn’t need to pull a gun, but just pull the lever of the voting machine. In this case, unhealthy and unattractive females don’t need to step in the ring themselves, because they just use the XY transvestites to harm the female competition.

Viewed from another angle, there’s some karma occurring, as Title IX was government coercion in the first place.

4
MarkusCincinnatus 4 points ago +4 / -0

She’s full of inconsistencies. Right before she talks about the importance of weighing evidence, she waves around the bullshit indictments as if they’re evidence of anything more than the existence of Trump’s false accusers. It seems she’s talking to a lawyer named Mark who she butters up by saying that he proves his cases with evidence. She then wrongly applies that flattery to Joe Biden and contrasts Trump as if he’s a lawyer. Her mind is disorganized.

9
MarkusCincinnatus 9 points ago +9 / -0

Not only did the suspect draw a gun, he fired it and grazed the hand of the cop who grabbed it. The cops can’t risk the suspect getting another shot off, so they make sure the threat is eliminated.

It makes me wonder if the suspect was hoping for suicide-by-cop.

2
MarkusCincinnatus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, I upvoted your comment because I think you’re on to something. Maybe a thesis like ‘People lacking inner monologue are easier to bamboozle.’

It’s just not the whole story w/ covid and the other major hoaxes.

1
MarkusCincinnatus 1 point ago +2 / -1

a huge percentage of humanity doesn’t have an inner monologue”

Maybe not that huge.

I took a poll, and not a single person on here responded that they didn’t have an inner monologue, which was exactly what I expected“

There are also plenty of people who do have inner monologues who got duped by the covid hoax. Those people’s problems are less related to intellect or cognition than character. Specifically, they suffer from vanity/ pride, and this is where the sunken cost fallacy gets them. If the establishment is wrong, and the vain dupes have already spent so much of their lives moving up within the establishment, that would mean that they’ve malinvested their life force. “Nah, I’m not the type of person who would invest myself into a corrupt or incompetent establishment. Therefore, the establishment is right and covid is a super cereal threat.” A bit of character in the form of humility, skepticism, curiosity, research work ethic, and willingness to stand apart would’ve done them heaps of good.

6
MarkusCincinnatus 6 points ago +6 / -0

A few euros salary is all it took for these sell-outs to do a complete inversion of their mandate to protect the Irish.

The townspeople should remind each cuckcop that when he kneels before the Lord to receive judgement, he’ll no longer have a pocketful of euros. He won’t have a blue line of fellow sell-out cops. He won’t have any authority. All he’ll have are guilt and shame.

3
MarkusCincinnatus 3 points ago +3 / -0

For John, this is long after the thrill of living is gone

3
MarkusCincinnatus 3 points ago +3 / -0

had the pleasure of seeing Sharp Dressed Simple Man tour on Labor Day weekend

1
MarkusCincinnatus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Red flags of possible infidelity:

  • solo attendance at sexually themed parties

  • flirty female colleagues

  • communication with a mysterious female

  • going to the fitness center when it’s supposed to be closed (or going somewhere else)

  • clandestine Meetic account

These look bad, but they’re not conclusive evidence. Miriam should try to get conclusive evidence before reacting to infidelity. Maybe your wife could help Miriam figure out how to get the proof. Maybe there will be an opportunity at the fiesta. Maybe recruit a James O’Keefe - type to record a drunken confession. I would advise holding off on telling Sylvain's parents about the circumstantial evidence until harder evidence is secured. Think of it as a sting operation where you don’t want hm to get his guard up prematurely. He might turn it around and make things worse for Miriam. It seems she’s been snooping on his phone and work computer, so she has some dirt on her hands that he could exploit.

Also, did Sylvain condone or warn against Miriam taking the vaxx? If he told her not to take it but she did anyway and made herself less healthy and attractive, then maybe you could have some empathy for him:

6
MarkusCincinnatus 6 points ago +6 / -0

The females’ pics look like a slideshow of ‘after’ photos at a rhinoplasty office

1
MarkusCincinnatus 1 point ago +1 / -0

In light of your subsequent prioritization of ex-twitter, what do you think of the conspiracy theory that dubious bans from GAW are nudges towards the larger digital battlefield?

view more: Next ›