Think how easy it would be to fake a moon mission when you have to replicate one on earth for training purposes.
If the Apolo Mission were authentic, we would not have spent the last fifty years flying no higher than five hundred miles off the surface of earth. If we could go 238,000 miles out and back in the age of transistor radios and tube TVs, we would have done something similar in the ensuing decades.
So now that we are ending our research on the ISS and moving to build our new space station around the moon (which will take more fuel but give us more valuable research for deep space travel), what will the new narrative be?
"Oh well if the moon landings were real then how come it took us 50 years to build a moon space station?"
Also, since we are sending people back to the moon in this decade, does the 20's not count as an ensuing decade?
Think how easy it would be to fake a moon mission when you have to replicate one on earth for training purposes.
If the Apolo Mission were authentic, we would not have spent the last fifty years flying no higher than five hundred miles off the surface of earth. If we could go 238,000 miles out and back in the age of transistor radios and tube TVs, we would have done something similar in the ensuing decades.
So now that we are ending our research on the ISS and moving to build our new space station around the moon (which will take more fuel but give us more valuable research for deep space travel), what will the new narrative be?
"Oh well if the moon landings were real then how come it took us 50 years to build a moon space station?"
Also, since we are sending people back to the moon in this decade, does the 20's not count as an ensuing decade?