“That infringement threatens not just significant monetary damages, but the potential for injunctive relief that would threaten Twitter’s ongoing business as currently operated.”
This feels like an extremely important part of this story that no one is even discussing. What ended up happening here?
“Mr. Zatko alleges that:
Twitter’s platform is built in significant part on the misappropriation and infringement of third party intellectual property”
https://twitter.com/sparklingruby/status/1620625924097179649?s=20&t=8yV-HY-qn0MdTaQQOI5iTQ
When it comes to doing illegal things with large amounts of data, eventually you have to start doing illegal things to acquire support for it because you can't put the labor used for it on the books. It's basically impossible to support it in the long term because you have to obscure any man hours you throw at it, and any you use to hide it...and you have to hide what you use to hide it....and so on.