Bill Gates came out admitted the vaccines did nothing during the pandemic, MIT expert comes out around the same exact time saying all the vaccines did was harm people.. and thats it? No MSM coverage? .... just moving on time?
What the hell.. am i missing something here?
Thanks for the link. I think you're just missing the part where he says "so you lose protection"- so he's saying what he's said all along- that the vaccines were good for the variants that they are formulated for and that they're not broad. Which is a lot different than "did nothing"- Gates still (and Trump still, for that matter) says that the vaccines saved millions. Gates just thinks we need better ones for new variants.
But why did MIT guy in 2021 ask for a haul to the vaccine if they were good for variants? And why was Bill talking about depopulation early on. You could very well be right.. and I am sorry for I guess gasslighting here.. that wasn't my intention, I just didn't know Bill was always saying this all along.. I didn't follow him enough. So that's my bad
I'm not saying the vaccine is good for variants. Neither is Gates, for that matter. He's saying that the vaccines were great in the beginning of the pandemic- but that now that there are variants that you lose protection too soon.
Gates is kind of an idiot- yes, he did talk about vaccines and population control, but that was like a decade before covid, and he was talking about third world countries and birth control. In places where the death rate falls, so does the birth rate. That whole thing for him was about his carbon emissions stuff.
I fall into a weird category here. I have pretty extensive professional medical/research background. I have a family member who is an epidemiologist, and a father who has held a Q clearance for the last 35 years. I don't actually think that the vaccines are the weapon here- I think that the virus is. While I don't necessarily think that it's a good thing to have vaccine produced spike proteins in your body, I Also DEFINITELY don't think it's a good thing to have the virus produced spike proteins PLUS the other 28 proteins that it produces in your body when you get the virus. So, yeah, it all sucks.
And MIT guy, is not actually an MIT guy. He's a guy from MIT Sloan. It's a business school, so I would assume that that's why the MSM wouldn't care what he had to say.
So the virus, the spike protein, is the weapon.. but the vaccine produces more of the "weapon", the spike protein, right? This is what Malone, Mccullough, Ryan, kory.. all the doctors are saying that they could have picked any other part of the virus to replicate.. but they chose the weapon, the spike, instead. These doctors also say there is no telling when the body stops producing this spike once injected.
I like your view on it here... but why are mccullough, Kory, Ryan, Malone, many others saying they picked the wrong part of the virus to replicate, the spike protein, in to the vaccines. They are saying the spike is the weapon here.. and the vaccine produces much more spike protein than the virus..
I can only guess based on my past experience that they chose the spike protein because they were thinking that it would be the most neutralizing- it's the outside of the virus, and the virus uses the spike to bind to your cells. I think they were thinking that if they could get it to not be able to bind from the jump, then that would be the way to stop it from hijacking your cells in the first place. Clearly that did not work. At first, it seemingly did a better job, but as even idiot Gates was saying- it really only worked that way for the original strain, and then whatever variants that it was formulated for. When later variants came along, with huge mutations on the spike protein- seems like it stopped any sort of sterilizing immunity that it would have provided in the first place.
So yeah- I've seen a lot of cell damage from different viruses in an electron microscope. What this virus does to cells? This damn thing is a weapon. There's no question in my mind that this virus was a product of gain of function. Whether it was released on purpose, or just a product of shitty oversight and sheer idiocy? I really don't know. Also- the vaccine does not produce anywhere near the same amount of spike protein as the virus itself does- if it did, it would probably be better at neutralizing the damn thing. And the cells that the virus takes over die mass death.
That director guy also said that.. what if the vaccine contents linger in the body for a long time or forever.. thus vaccine was worth it to you even with the all the vaccine adverse events, the blood clotting, the menstrual cycle issues... ?
What would be your other guess for them using the spike protein?
Sorry- missed this one until I just saw it in my inbox. My other guess is really just an extension of this one. They already had the groundwork laid for a vaccine based on the spike protein for the SARS virus. They never needed to complete any vaccine trials for that because they were able to contain it (in 2003). It had too high of a mortality rate to go very far.
So they knew,that this spike protein would caused deadly blood clotting.. and that was better then getting a less amount of the spike from the virus itself? Now, as many doctors were talking about over a year ago, the Pfizer of director has confirmed that the vaccine is causing problems with menstrual cycles in girls.. doesn't the menstrual cycle start in the brain.. from like hormones.. does this vaccine pass the blood brain barrier? Also, what was your opinion on WHY MIT guy called for an end to the vaccine program back in 2021.. from that video.
I'll reply to both of your comments here- so I don't think that anyone knew anything about what the spike protein would do when they chose it. But the virus causes far more cases of clotting than the vaccine does. Like, a hell of a lot more. Also- the vaccine doesn't contain any spike proteins. It just makes your own cells produce them to make antibodies against them. Just like the virus does (in case you don't know how that works, a virus basically hijacks your cells and uses them as a virus factory to make copies of itself). So when the virus uses the spike to bind to your cells, then virus then enters your cells and replicates. This makes your body produce all 29 proteins that this particular virus contains. So, no matter which of the proteins they used in any type of vaccine- the virus itself would be making that protein and all of the other proteins as well.
As far as the menstrual cycle goes- that probably has more to do with inflammation than anything else- the lining of the uterus that's shed during a menstrual cycle is tied to the immune system.
As far a the vaccine contents go? There's micrograms of contents in a vaccine- and they put this one in a huge muscle. The thing that I'd be most concerned about there is the PEG. But, even at that- your body metabolizes it quickly and gets rid of it like any other waste.
I don't really have an opinion of MIT guy- like I said, he's from MIT Sloan- a business school.
Combined with MIT guy coming out on the same day. The MIT guy literally said nothing good about the vaccine, in fact he said they harm people. Maybe your right.. but Bill made a lot of money on this jab.. so I think he said it this way to ease the mind..