A high power transmitter and antenna array operating in the High Frequency (HF) range. The transmitter is capable of delivering up to 3.6 million Watts to an antenna system consisting of 180 crossed dipole antennas arranged as a rectangular, planar array.
Converting from Watts to Joules 3.6 million Watts running for 36 hours produces 4.6 x 10^11 Joules.
Summary: 2013 planned H.A.A.R.P project had capacity to generate the entire energy attributed to this earthquake in 36 hours.
Added: Looks like the 3.6 megawatt plan is now reality and even more, as per this recent announcement
Now account for atmospheric absorption, signal loss, dispersion
Okay, so lets assume that these and all other cumulative losses account for N% of the total energy.
At N = 50% loss, we would need 72 hours worth of energy
At N = 90% loss, we would need 360 hours or 15 days worth of energy
Going to the very extreme (which would be highly unlikely in reality) lets say the losses are 99%, in which case we will require 3600 hours or 5 months worth of energy.
All these are still very much within the realm of feasibility just as far as energy budget is concerned.
I believe the well depicted point in the OP was that the energy involved is so huge that it would be well outside the feasibility even from an energy budget.
Do you agree that, that is not the case?
explain how it gets transmitted and focused on the earthquake zone, tho.
This is an operational question and separate from the feasibility of the energy budget, which is what I was focusing on in this comment.
I agree that the transmission, and focusing processes requires further digging and the best way to do that is to continue doing what this elite research board does.
Okay, started doing some rough calculations for energy needed and whether its feasible.
Total energy released by the earthquake according to your calculations: 4 x 10^11 joules
When HAARP was still public they had planned, in 2013:
Converting from Watts to Joules 3.6 million Watts running for 36 hours produces 4.6 x 10^11 Joules.
Summary: 2013 planned H.A.A.R.P project had capacity to generate the entire energy attributed to this earthquake in 36 hours.
Added: Looks like the 3.6 megawatt plan is now reality and even more, as per this recent announcement
Now account for atmospheric absorption, signal loss, dispersion, and explain how it gets transmitted and focused on the earthquake zone, tho.
Okay, so lets assume that these and all other cumulative losses account for N% of the total energy.
At N = 50% loss, we would need 72 hours worth of energy
At N = 90% loss, we would need 360 hours or 15 days worth of energy
Going to the very extreme (which would be highly unlikely in reality) lets say the losses are 99%, in which case we will require 3600 hours or 5 months worth of energy.
All these are still very much within the realm of feasibility just as far as energy budget is concerned.
I believe the well depicted point in the OP was that the energy involved is so huge that it would be well outside the feasibility even from an energy budget.
Do you agree that, that is not the case?
This is an operational question and separate from the feasibility of the energy budget, which is what I was focusing on in this comment.
I agree that the transmission, and focusing processes requires further digging and the best way to do that is to continue doing what this elite research board does.