you are assuming the whole force of the earthquake needs to be generated by haarp?
I don't think the relationship between the earthquakes and the ionosphere is fully understood by conventional science. it may not be necessary to generate the whole force of an earthquake, but just to manipulate something and let nature do the rest.
physics nerd mistake lol
edit: just because you can calculate something, doesn't mean you should ;)
what theory of yours suggests that the energy of haarp must be equal to the energy of an earthquake? are you saying that you do fully understand the relationship between earthquakes and the ionosphere?
there are many different kinds of reactions in nature, many of which we don't understand.
personally I don't know that haarp was used to generate earthquakes. but i believe its a plausible theory, maybe even more plausible than assuming it is only capable of its officially stated purpose.
you are assuming the whole force of the earthquake needs to be generated by haarp?
I don't think the relationship between the earthquakes and the ionosphere is fully understood by conventional science. it may not be necessary to generate the whole force of an earthquake, but just to manipulate something and let nature do the rest.
physics nerd mistake lol
edit: just because you can calculate something, doesn't mean you should ;)
Definitely an unsupported assumption, but, ok, if it's not, can someone describe the theory? Or is it just "muh automatic resonance" and that's it?
what theory of yours suggests that the energy of haarp must be equal to the energy of an earthquake? are you saying that you do fully understand the relationship between earthquakes and the ionosphere?
there are many different kinds of reactions in nature, many of which we don't understand.
personally I don't know that haarp was used to generate earthquakes. but i believe its a plausible theory, maybe even more plausible than assuming it is only capable of its officially stated purpose.