what theory of yours suggests that the energy of haarp must be equal to the energy of an earthquake? are you saying that you do fully understand the relationship between earthquakes and the ionosphere?
there are many different kinds of reactions in nature, many of which we don't understand.
personally I don't know that haarp was used to generate earthquakes. but i believe its a plausible theory, maybe even more plausible than assuming it is only capable of its officially stated purpose.
Definitely an unsupported assumption, but, ok, if it's not, can someone describe the theory? Or is it just "muh automatic resonance" and that's it?
what theory of yours suggests that the energy of haarp must be equal to the energy of an earthquake? are you saying that you do fully understand the relationship between earthquakes and the ionosphere?
there are many different kinds of reactions in nature, many of which we don't understand.
personally I don't know that haarp was used to generate earthquakes. but i believe its a plausible theory, maybe even more plausible than assuming it is only capable of its officially stated purpose.