58 pages of anonymous John and Jane Does related to the Giuffre v Maxwell defamation case, and arguments from counsel as to why documents should or shouldn’t be unsealed that expose their identities. Not sure when Judge Preska is expected to rule on these/force documents to be unsealed.
(storage.courtlistener.com)
🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (14)
sorted by:
Oh, thanks for sticky, mods! Wasn’t expecting that.
FWIW, I believe the “mistaken” doe might be Alan Dershowitz, since Giuffre did publicly state she was mistaken about his involvement
I think I read somewhere that he counter-sued and that’s what forced her to redact her claim of his involvement. His team rattled her I believe, if anyone has additional information or can corroborate this I’d appreciate it!