58 pages of anonymous John and Jane Does related to the Giuffre v Maxwell defamation case, and arguments from counsel as to why documents should or shouldn’t be unsealed that expose their identities. Not sure when Judge Preska is expected to rule on these/force documents to be unsealed.
(storage.courtlistener.com)
🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (14)
sorted by:
What I want to know is how can something as salacious as this can remain private? Everything else leaks before the close of business the next day.
Probably because the leaks we get help the enemy’s agenda.
When things don’t leak, it’s because anyone who would leak the damning info likely knows they’d face death, or worse—the people they care about would be targeted for their loose lips.
At least, I’m of the opinion that the truth of how the world works—blackmail, trafficking, etc.—would cause the world to finally rise up against our oppressors.
They can’t let that info out.
I agree with you. I just think that both sides of the political spectrum have their narcissistic twerps who want to be the person to share a secret. Waiting for the liberal one to leak the Epstein list.