Why isnt the name of the Cargo carrier who owned the chemicals that were deliberately set on fire known? That seems a bit sus to knowingly ship toxic chems and not have precautionary packaging or be notified immediately to participate in the cleanup unless...it was deliberate. - The Great Awakening

159

Why isnt the name of the Cargo carrier who owned the chemicals that were deliberately set on fire known? That seems a bit sus to knowingly ship toxic chems and not have precautionary packaging or be notified immediately to participate in the cleanup unless...it was deliberate.

posted 1 year ago by 2moro2day 1 year ago by 2moro2day +159 / -0

Any info? Any thoughts?

34 comments

34 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (34)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– AllowMeToExplain 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Railroads have liability to conduct their business to the appropriate standard of care. Whether they did that or not depends on the circumstances. If, as I have seen elsewhere, they were alerted by some kind of fire or heat sensor but instructed to continue on another 20 miles until implosion, and that ends up the proximate cause of the derailing, they will for sure be liable.

If they were not privy to the type of cargo they were hauling, that can impact whether or not they are liable - assuming it changes the standard of care. Ohio is a comparative negligence state. Which means you are liable for the % of harm a jury assigns to you as fault. You can bet that plaintiffs lawyers will sue anyone that touched that train and let them fight it out. Railroad will likely seek contribution from other possible tortfeasors.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q