Thanks for your honesty! This is all incredibly interesting to me. My Brother was learning about this type of science before JFK was shot. Lots has been learned since then but as has been pointed out, this is all Tesla stuff. Nothing new except investment in application.
Very interesting how our government grabbed all of Tesla's research as soon as he died. I absolutely believe they would try to apply it, and all the stuff people attribute to aliens is human technology - or demons.
Getting "proof" that this particular EQ was outright caused (or even released) via HAARP is a tough bar of evidence to meet. Establishing motive you've done. Means to do so is the scientific part, and obviously we aren't going to be able to reproduce what "they" have.
No way were any of these balloons for spying! China is in no way deficient in satellites. Neither do I believe they destroyed all electronics in shooting it / them down; too much value in knowing what they were doing, and recovering the electronics would prove that. They just aren't telling us. That's my belief based on general suspicion, I don't have factual knowledge about any of this. I suppose we could be so incompetent as to allow it from Alaska to off the coast of S Carolina only to be completely destroyed - I just don't buy that. Without asserting any of the other possibilities as fact. (Cooperation with China, and possibly for a HAARP type thing being one of the more plausible ideas)
Thanks for your honesty! This is all incredibly interesting to me. My Brother was learning about this type of science before JFK was shot. Lots has been learned since then but as has been pointed out, this is all Tesla stuff. Nothing new except investment in application.
Very interesting how our government grabbed all of Tesla's research as soon as he died. I absolutely believe they would try to apply it, and all the stuff people attribute to aliens is human technology - or demons.
Getting "proof" that this particular EQ was outright caused (or even released) via HAARP is a tough bar of evidence to meet. Establishing motive you've done. Means to do so is the scientific part, and obviously we aren't going to be able to reproduce what "they" have.
No way were any of these balloons for spying! China is in no way deficient in satellites. Neither do I believe they destroyed all electronics in shooting it / them down; too much value in knowing what they were doing, and recovering the electronics would prove that. They just aren't telling us. That's my belief based on general suspicion, I don't have factual knowledge about any of this. I suppose we could be so incompetent as to allow it from Alaska to off the coast of S Carolina only to be completely destroyed - I just don't buy that. Without asserting any of the other possibilities as fact. (Cooperation with China, and possibly for a HAARP type thing being one of the more plausible ideas)