mRNA Vaccines are “Vaccines”
(aaronsiri.substack.com)
Comments (21)
sorted by:
The audacity of you people
Here’s one more comment you can impotently downvote
No. Aaron Siri addresses that. You weren’t parroting iTs nOt a VaCciNe when acellular pertussis came out, don’t start now.
Originally a vaccine was: "a substance used to stimulate immunity to a particular infectious disease or pathogen, typically prepared from an inactivated or weakened form of the causative agent or from its constituents or products."
An mRNA jab, on the other hand, does not do that. Instead, it introduces into the body some instructions to manufacture the pathogen itself.
It is the difference between giving a man a fish and teaching him how to fish. You can argue that in both cases the man ends up with fish but the difference is obvious.
In one case you receive a small, one off, amount of the "causative agent" and in the other you are setting up a manufacturing process possibly for life. In the case of the COVID-19 jabs, it is the spike protein that gets manufactured in the cells of the recipient and that spike protein is in itself toxic.
The COVID-19 jabs are creating toxin factories, in perpetuity, in every recipient.
The audacity of you people to think you know better than Aaron Siri.
It isn't a question of "knowing". I have put together a story in my mind about mRNA vaccines so I can better understand how they work. I gave you that story. As far as I can tell, nothing in your linked article contradicts what I said apart from what the previous definition of a vaccine was.
I quoted the first definition my search engine found and it clearly shows that the mRNA jabs would not have been counted as vaccines by that definition. No weakened or causative agent is injected. In my analogy, no fish were given away.
If you can point out an error in either premise or logic then I can take that on board and have a rethink. Until then, I will maintain my view.
Yes the article refuted the sole attempt at a point you made, he’s extremely familiar with the definition of vaccine
Remember when Aaron Siri had Stanley Plotkin on deposition for 8 hours? No, I’m sure you know better.
Are there any other jabs, called vaccines or not, which contrive to get the recipients' own cells to manufacture the antigen?
Treating things the same way does not make them the same.
We should treat all people alike but does that make men and women the same?
Why are manufacturers of “muh tradishunul” vaccines immune from liability?
As u/tweety51a so eloquently put it
Yes,Covid mRNA shots are vaccines, just like acellular pertussis is a vaccine. Aaron Siri crushes it, like usual.
Stop worshipping vaccines.
mRNA gene altering drugs are NOT "vaccines" and never will be, regardless of fraudulent definitions being applied to the drug. Calling it a "vaccine" or changing the definition of a vaccine is deliberately deceptive, and false advertisement.
Real vaccines introduce a germ to an individuals immune system, and that individuals immune system learns, and decides on an appropriate immune system response to defeat that germ.
mRNA gene drugs do NOT introduce any germ to a persons immune system- because it is NOT a vaccine. An individuals immune system is intentionally deceived into producing a response that is programed into it by mRNA gene altering methods. The victims immune system is denied the option to fight against the infection by its natural means. Instead, doctors and scientists who have never examined the victims immune system stimulate the victims immune system to respond to the stimulation of the mRNA drug, instead of a germ. People are given a drug that is proven to be ineffective at preventing, curing, reducing symptoms, and stopping the spread of covid19, and is also proven dangerous. mRNA advertised as a "vaccine" is a fraud. Any medical professionals stating otherwise need to cease and desist, or else be held liable for perpetuating that fraud.
Now do tetanus.