Summary of Key Facts
Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine contains truncated mRNA, which the EMA flagged as a reason for its “major objection,” indicating a preclusion of their approval.
Pfizer has not investigated the detrimental outcomes of truncated mRNA in its vaccines.
Pfizer submitted Western blot figures to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the EMA that were digitally generated—not from actual experiments.
There has been an alarming lack of action taken by health authorities on this issue.
Truncated mRNA potentially contributes to multiple vaccine-related injuries, including misfolded spike protein-induced fibrous blood clots, autoimmune disorders, and cancer.
These problems with the Pfizer vaccine could have resulted in drastic product quality variations from batch to batch. This could explain the difference in adverse events experienced by vaccine recipients.
The root cause of such irresponsible conduct by pharma and health authorities is a lack of ethics.
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/pfizer-knowingly-allowed-dangerous-components-its-vaccines
This is the first time I've seen someone actually present a plausible explanation for what we're seeing with appropriate sourcing, citations, and physical evidence from reliable sources.
This is something worth looking at carefully here. I suspect they're on the right track to understanding exactly where some of the key symptoms we're seeing are coming from. Small interfering RNAs are a well-known issue. In fact, that mechanism of action is actually used in some newer experimental drugs specifically using these to disrupt malfunctioning or harmful proteins. A key example is with Alzheimer's research and efforts to disrupt the amyloid plaques from forming.
It is well known that these may also cause inflammation which may explain myo- and pericarditis symptoms or the disruption of immune function linked to higher rates of certain cancers. Naturally, this sort of thing has the potential to interfere with the signals of growth and development, which would explain some of the fertility issues we're hearing about as well. Depending on the nature of the specific RNA fragments generated, this is a plausible explanation for the spectrum of symptoms we're seeing in vaccinated people.
---------------------------- That said, due diligence --------------------------
The work should be evaluated in full:
Thus far, IMO, what's presented in Part 1 is plausible and well cited. All of the evidence appears to be meticulously presented, sources to reliable sources, including European regulators equivalent to the FDA here in the US. The authors simply add context that rings true with my own training in molecular biology.
Part 2, however, is highly speculative. None of the mechanisms of actions presented as possible explanations for various symptoms is backed by supporting evidence. Naturally, it is unethical to experiment on people, but animal or in vitro tests on human cells is ethical. We need more than speculation. This isn't a criticism of the authors so much as a criticism of regulatory bodies like FDA for failing to do this work.
Lastly, the author concludes by blaming this all on a societal moral failure. It's a totally uncalled for injection of personal bias which undercuts the quality of the article, particularly of the second part. This case ISN'T proven yet. Not by a long shot.
Here is the full and complete story pertaining to Part 1. https://www.pogo.org/investigation/2021/03/avoiding-the-subject-on-pfizer-vaccine-quality-control-fda-says-less-than-european-counterpart
Looking for cause and effect seems to be an extremely obvious statement, but that is not always the case. Take, for instance, the "chicken and egg," argument which makes establishing causality one of the most difficult aspects of scientific research. It is also one of the most important factors, because it can misdirect scientists. It also leaves the research open to manipulation by interest groups, who will take the results and proclaim them as a truth.