There is a massive logical gap between "the COMM before the storm" 1 month before Q started posting and the Josh Reid's theory that Q was started by someone unrelated to the movement. You cannot have it both ways.
Suppose they knew that they were going to reach out with some type of comm wherein the narrator would be called Q - or something similar - and then they happened to find the Q account on 4chan already active?
Or maybe Josh is a little off - they intentionally had the first two create Q and then conducted a pre-planned takeover of the account, or circumstances changed and dictated it. It's a small error in a huge mass of knowledge he is spot on with. Cant be too critical
There is a massive logical gap between "the COMM before the storm" 1 month before Q started posting and the Josh Reid's theory that Q was started by someone unrelated to the movement. You cannot have it both ways.
Meh, why not?
Suppose they knew that they were going to reach out with some type of comm wherein the narrator would be called Q - or something similar - and then they happened to find the Q account on 4chan already active?
Or maybe Josh is a little off - they intentionally had the first two create Q and then conducted a pre-planned takeover of the account, or circumstances changed and dictated it. It's a small error in a huge mass of knowledge he is spot on with. Cant be too critical
oh I loved the overall talk. There were many interesting and good points.