Not to mention that we have only been recording actual temperatures for about 100 years. So anything that says "highest recorded" means highest in 100 years, or in other words, the highest in 0.00002% of the earths existence.
So there is a minscule recorded increase in temp, that they have to artificially get by moving sensors to the correct strategic locations, over a what is a completely negligable amount of time. And thats assuming a rising temp would be bad and not good. The whole thing is a complete farce.
There are also instrumentation issues and the method data is collected. As an example, they no longer use tidal measurements for sea level but use satellite data exclusively.
Yep, par for the course...
Not to mention that we have only been recording actual temperatures for about 100 years. So anything that says "highest recorded" means highest in 100 years, or in other words, the highest in 0.00002% of the earths existence.
So there is a minscule recorded increase in temp, that they have to artificially get by moving sensors to the correct strategic locations, over a what is a completely negligable amount of time. And thats assuming a rising temp would be bad and not good. The whole thing is a complete farce.
There are also instrumentation issues and the method data is collected. As an example, they no longer use tidal measurements for sea level but use satellite data exclusively.