Dr. Stefan Lanka offered a 100,000 Euro prize to anybody that could prove a measles virus even existed in 2015. One clown showed up with establishment nonsense papers that proved absolutely nothing, as Lanka asserted. The "judge" (actually a LEGAL-stooge finder of fact and law by private coronation) looked at the papers for less than an hour, fired up his "blind trust in authority" brainwashee programming, awarded victory to the clown and ordered Lanka to pay up on his challenge.
The media had an absolute field day with this result, shouting loud and proud from the rooftops how Dr. Lanka had been discredited. And still today, when someone is told about Dr. Lanka's assertions about unicorn-viruses, 999 out of 1000 people do a quick "Google" search, read one of the many lamestream media articles about this stooge-verdict, and come to the conclusion that Lanka is quack and a shill because he lost this case.
This is how the game works folks.
1 out of those 1000 digs deeper, beyond the censorship, beyond the establishment liars. And what does that 1 find? He/She learns that Lanka appealed the verdict and was given the opportunity to put some "experts" on the stand. And low and behold, the "experts" were forced to admit that the paper's the clown submitted did not prove the existence of any measles virus whatsoever. They didn't even come close to doing so. The judge had to VERY RELUCTANTLY find in favor of Dr. Lanka and order the clown to pay his expenses, reversing the previous case that was decided by the uninformed opinion of a single judge.
Not a single lamestream media outlet reported on this verdict. Thus, their previous articles about Lanka "stand as truth" in the minds of the majority. This is how the media "lies by omission", their #1 tool of deception.
This was a most important verdict as **EVERY SINGLE SCIENTIFIC PAPER IN THE FIELD OF VIROLOGY" cites the original 1954 pseudoscientific paper claiming to have found and "isolated" the alleged measles-virus. This measles paper rescued the previously dying field of "virology" in 1954. And look what's happened since!
Lanka very simply pointed out that none of the papers submitted even REMOTELY followed the allegedly tried-and-true "Scientific Method". None included an hypothesis, an independent variable, nor a control experiment. Actually, none since the 1954 measles paper have bothered to do any control experiments. John Enders actually DID DO a control experiment in 1954. The irony of all ironies is that Enders wrote directly in this seminal virology paper that's literally cited by every scientific virology paper using the "viral culturing" technique since, that the results of his control experiment were "INDISTINGUISHABLE from his main experiment which allegedly proved the existence of muh-measles-virus!!!! A statement that is quite astonishingly ignored by the establishment virologists to this very day!
In one feel swoop, Lanka demonstrated the lies, deception and complicity embedded in the medical, scientific, legal and media institutions. And almost nobody knows about it. For good reason, eh? How else could they have pulled off the Covid fraud if everybody knew about this?
And Lanka picked the seminal 1954 measles paper because all other papers were based on this one. He could have chosen any paper on unicorn-viruses to discredit them, but instead discredited them all by discrediting what they're all based on.
And what's worse, the vast majority of people won't even bother to dig in and learn about this situation, preferring instead to defend these institutions as our sole-providers of "reliable evidence and proof" when in fact, they most often provide the exact opposite!
Viruses don't exist and here's all the proof you should need as the proof of every other "virus" that's ever been "pseudo-discovered" has used this very same manufacturing method, or the more recent "sequencing" method which is also a fraud on its face as it's nothing more than computer-based software assembly of human RNA fragments - aka "virtual reality".
Dr. Stefan Lanka offered a 100,000 Euro prize to anybody that could prove a measles virus even existed in 2015. One clown showed up with establishment nonsense papers that proved absolutely nothing, as Lanka asserted. The "judge" (actually a LEGAL-stooge finder of fact and law by private coronation) looked at the papers for less than an hour, fired up his "blind trust in authority" brainwashee programming, awarded victory to the clown and ordered Lanka to pay up on his challenge.
The media had an absolute field day with this result, shouting loud and proud from the rooftops how Dr. Lanka had been discredited. And still today, when someone is told about Dr. Lanka's assertions about unicorn-viruses, 999 out of 1000 people do a quick "Google" search, read one of the many lamestream media articles about this stooge-verdict, and come to the conclusion that Lanka is quack and a shill because he lost this case.
This is how the game works folks.
1 out of those 1000 digs deeper, beyond the censorship, beyond the establishment liars. And what does that 1 find? He/She learns that Lanka appealed the verdict and was given the opportunity to put some "experts" on the stand. And low and behold, the "experts" were forced to admit that the paper's the clown submitted did not prove the existence of any measles virus whatsoever. They didn't even come close to doing so. The judge had to VERY RELUCTANTLY find in favor of Dr. Lanka and order the clown to pay his expenses, reversing the previous case that was decided by the uninformed opinion of a single judge.
Not a single lamestream media outlet reported on this verdict. Thus, their previous articles about Lanka "stand as truth" in the minds of the majority. This is how the media "lies by omission", their #1 tool of deception.
This was a most important verdict as **EVERY SINGLE SCIENTIFIC PAPER IN THE FIELD OF VIROLOGY" cites the original 1954 pseudoscientific paper claiming to have found and "isolated" the alleged measles-virus. This measles paper rescued the previously dying field of "virology" in 1954. And look what's happened since!
Lanka very simply pointed out that none of the papers submitted even REMOTELY followed the allegedly tried-and-true "Scientific Method". None included an hypothesis, an independent variable, nor a control experiment. Actually, none since the 1954 measles paper have bothered to do any control experiments. John Enders actually DID DO a control experiment in 1954. The irony of all ironies is that Enders wrote directly in this seminal virology paper that's literally cited by every scientific virology paper using the "viral culturing" technique since, that the results of his control experiment were "INDISTINGUISHABLE from his main experiment which allegedly proved the existence of muh-measles-virus!!!! A statement that is quite astonishingly ignored by the establishment virologists to this very day!
In one feel swoop, Lanka demonstrated the lies, deception and complicity embedded in the medical, scientific, legal and media institutions. And almost nobody knows about it. For good reason, eh? How else could they have pulled off the Covid fraud if everybody knew about this?
And Lanka picked the seminal 1954 measles paper because all other papers were based on this one. He could have chosen any paper on unicorn-viruses to discredit them, but instead discredited them all by discrediting what they're all based on.
And what's worse, the vast majority of people won't even bother to dig in and learn about this situation, preferring instead to defend these institutions as our sole-providers of "reliable evidence and proof" when in fact, they most often provide the exact opposite!
Viruses don't exist and here's all the proof you should need as the proof of every other "virus" that's ever been "pseudo-discovered" has used this very same manufacturing method, or the more recent "sequencing" method which is also a fraud on its face as it's nothing more than computer-based software assembly of human RNA fragments - aka "virtual reality".
Caveat emptor.
At that point it is not only warranted but encouraged that you stab the judge and the person awarded.