The correct scientific method is observation and replication. If you observe a phenomenon, and can use your theory to predict all stages of said phenomenon and/or replicate it, then you're on to something. We are imperfect, as individuals, and so we must collaborate to obtain ever-higher levels of understanding, as one single human isn't capable of understanding it all, alone. We must allow ourselves to trust one another, to build knowledge that is beyond ourselves. But for that to work, for said trust to work, we must adhere to it, literally, religiously. God made the Truth part of his armor for a reason: a collective of God fearing men will unlock more secrets of the universe than a thousand generations of heathens. Our problem is we correlate "science" with godlessness, not realizing that both concepts are not mutually exclusive.
The correct scientific method is observation and replication. If you observe a phenomenon, and can use your theory to predict all stages of said phenomenon and/or replicate it, then you're on to something. We are imperfect, as individuals, and so we must collaborate to obtain ever-higher levels of understanding, as one single human isn't capable of understanding it all, alone. We must allow ourselves to trust one another, to build knowledge that is beyond ourselves. But for that to work, for said trust to work, we must adhere to it, literally, religiously. God made the Truth part of his armor for a reason: a collective of God fearing men will unlock more secrets of the universe than a thousand generations of heathens. Our problem is we correlate "science" with godlessness, not realizing that both concepts are not mutually exclusive.