I reject the premise that the poll provides a valid comparison.
I trust the evidence.
I neither trust Tucker Carlson or the J6 Committee outside of what is specifically supported by the totality of evidence.
In this framework, one can decipher that J6 was lying from the evidence of their actions during the investigation. One can also see that Tucker has so far provided evidence contradictory of the J6 group conclusions and demonstrating that J6 did indeed hide or alter the original evidence they used for their conclusion. In as much as Tucker presents unaltered evidence showing the events true to what happened, the evidence will be trustworthy. If/when he deviates from that simple path, then his presentation will become suspect of being misleading.
I reject the premise that the poll provides a valid comparison.
I trust the evidence. I neither trust Tucker Carlson or the J6 Committee outside of what is specifically supported by the totality of evidence.
In this framework, one can decipher that J6 was lying from the evidence of their actions during the investigation. One can also see that Tucker has so far provided evidence contradictory of the J6 group conclusions and demonstrating that J6 did indeed hide or alter the original evidence they used for their conclusion. In as much as Tucker presents unaltered evidence showing the events true to what happened, the evidence will be trustworthy. If/when he deviates from that simple path, then his presentation will become suspect of being misleading.
I agree the poll is flawed, however this is an information war and I don't want this guy to get a win.