Don't y'all think its totally amazing just how many people including many anons are all in a tizz about the 'Trump arrest'?
Just look at that alone. Look at the affect this 'leaked' announcement is having. On who? Where? What?
Call me a skeptic, but I thought we'd be used to this by now. It happens again and again and again. Narrative build up, enhanced of course by DJT in the middle.
I feel like DJT (with his team) is a master magician, tweaking the dials on a massive telescope that focuses the attention of the USA and the Cabal and the population on one particular area or target.
Red dot, meet cat. Cat, meet red dot.
Frogs should not be cats, but should study the cats, observe their behavior, and figure out exactly how and why they move like they do. The red dot operator is doing what he does, but we are not the target.
That's how I see this all.
I never make predictions, but I'm really biting my tongue hard to not say flat out there will be No arrest and by the end of next week, we'll ALL understand why.
But, like you, I'll have to wait and see.
Note: remember the 'Trump' digital trading cards (big announcement) and what actually followed it later in the day....
Note 2: It's already March 22 here, so I'm wondering what I'll see tomorrow morning.
Stay frosty, pepes. Specially you US frogs.
I remember, after the election, Trump posted a tweet saying something about the election being "under protest". I also searched for the word protest in Q drops and there are 23 of them: https://qanon.pub/?q=protest Then, since there's a new site to research drops based on the Q clock, I found that today is 10 on the clock and searched for that and the word protest on that new site. There are 4 drops. None of them stuck out for me, but have a look: https://anontools.xyz/?text=protest&min=10
Question:
Is "the Q clock" actually Q, or is it anons?
Answer: It is anons.
let's not forget that point, because calling something "the Q clock" implies it is Q, when it isn't, right?
There were at least a couple places where Q confirmed the clock, even if it wasn't put out by Q. Although, who really knows, since we don't know who is on the Q team, do we? One place in particular that I recall is drop 1232 on Apr 21, 2018. That date falls on the number 15 on the clock, and the words "on the clock" are part of the message. https://anontools.xyz/?text=on+the+clock&min=15
Hmmm....
OK, I admit that I never went too deep into the clock theoreticals. Not how my brain works.
There's another on the clock: Q1044.
I guess tho, I think it's worth recognizing that there's an important difference between saying something isn't Q and saying it isn't legit.
I don't know if the clock is legit, accurate, or how it was formulated, but Q emphasized that there is Q and anons for just such a case: The clock isn't Q, even if Q confirmed it (Haven't looked at it enough to know if that confirmation holds water for me or not, btw. "On the clock" could certainly have other meanings.)
But....
Thanks for shedding a bit of light on this one to an as-yet non-clocker.
Thanks, and I guess I missed drop 1044. That date (apr 6 2018) shows up as 0 on the Q clock. https://anontools.xyz/?min=0&text=on+the+clock Though, I have to admit that I haven't found any way to use the clock predicatively, and I'm definitely not an expert. It's just interesting to see how things line up sometimes.