Tell me again why Women's reproductive health doesn't mean anything?
(www.theguardian.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (43)
sorted by:
So, Idaho says babies should be born, NOT killed, and save their lives. Drs and Insurance companies respond in a way that may effect the health of mothers and babies. So, the people that what to save babies lives are at fault for what Insurance companies do that cause doctors to move away and may kill lives??? The law is to save babies like us, we were babies years ago!! Side with fixing the issues and save lives and not a reason to blame those that wish life for the babies!
I side with female reproductive health. You ruined it, you now have to deal with the consequences. People that side with it don't have these problems. The ones that both voted against female reproductive health or happen to live where they voted against female reproductive health have to live with it.
AND there are women with autoimmune diseases that aren't getting proper care because their medication is considered an abortifact. Go explain yourselves to them while they suffer so people can pay themselves on the back that there won't even be any women Rx'd a medication that could do something as a side effect they don't agree with.