You can argue that, BUT, you would be ignoring the understood purpose of a grand jury. So, I really don't think it's going to change now. AND, it's been working pretty well for decades if not centuries.
This post is borderline misinformation. Not a good look for us.
Let the enemy make their mistakes... don't stop them.
This is BS.
A DA is not LEGALLY obligated to show exculpatory evidence to a GRAND JURY.
In a regular trial, yes, that is required. But, NOT for a grand jury.
Nothing. NOTHING... to see here.
But when they are bringing the Grand Jury don't you think it is morally unjust to hold back evidence?
You can argue that, BUT, you would be ignoring the understood purpose of a grand jury. So, I really don't think it's going to change now. AND, it's been working pretty well for decades if not centuries.
This post is borderline misinformation. Not a good look for us.
Let the enemy make their mistakes... don't stop them.