There's a ton of these on YouTube that imo are better presented. The evidence is
(1) Material and weaving of the Shroud. The main deboonker claims are based on carbon dating an edge piece,but that turned to be a Middle Ages repair strip that had been attached with French weaving to replace a worn edge. It was stained with tea to look older.
(2) Ancient pollen, from the Holy Land and everywhere the Shroud has been on its way to Turin.
(3) Unique dirt on the side facing the body where the nose and the knees of the Man in the Shroud hit the ground, as for instance from falling under a heavy weight and getting smashed onto the pavement.
(4) Bloodstains high in bilirubin, which comes from prolonged torture and preserves the red color forever.
(5) Historical accuracy. The Romans did crucify people, did this up to the 300s AD, and crucified at least 30,000. They didn't execute just anyone this way, but escaped slaves, traitors, rebels, and similar threats to their Deep State. There are existing nails from crucifixion. There were various ways to do it to prolong suffering.
Of all the evidence that the Man in the Shroud was Jesus, most is in the bloodstains. They tell that he was lashed with three types of whip; that the nails in his hands actually went through the wrists, although they could have been driven in on the hand side and come through the wrists in back.
They show he was stabbed between the 5th and 6th ribs with a particular type of Roman lance, hitting the heart and draining water from the pericardial sac and pulmonary edema, as well as blood.
They show the wounds from the crown of thorns which seems to have been an indignity ever given to only one man, and that the crown was not a wreath, but a cap type crown as was common in the Middle East. Also, the thorns in back were driven in much further, perhaps in the aforementioned fall.
The bloodstains on the face on the Shroud exactly match the ones on the Sudorium, the "napkin" that was neatly folded in the tomb. This extra cloth was a Jewish requirement for transporting a body with a disfigured face and not a regular funeral wrap, although nothing against leaving it on. The face image is not on it, ergo it was taken off and folded by the mourners before folding the Shroud.
There's so much more. The image is caused by oxidation of a layer thinner than a hair. It could easily be brushed off. One person calculated that this could be a done by a pulse of a billion watts of UV light for a billionth of a second, but I am not qualified to comment on that.
You have to consider everything you see on the internet as having come originally from a very few sources, whose voices are endlessly multiplied, and not get distracted by sheer numbers of reports. That said, the Shroud seems to have had quite a few serious investigators, more than a lot of other subjects.
This is long but covers many aspects. Fr. Dalton is actually a lecturer on the Shroud. Like most Catholics, he won't commit to saying this definitely wrapped Jesus. It has to be declared so by the Church, I guess.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HAbuG-oVq1Q
This is to me one of the most fascinating studies. The authors are talking about the energy that created the image coming from the long center axis of the body and being projected onto the Shroud. Now the body is not perfectly flat, see the 3d image, nor is the Shroud evenly draped over it. The image is strongest in the parts that are closest to the body. The authors of this video are saying that in the blurriness, they are seeing movement, like a stroboscope picture with little jerky gaps in it. A movie of Christ starting to move his hands.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xAVZp9tW5FU
Several efforts to recreate Jesus in 3d from the Shroud. In real life (or death) this body would be gray. Would it show the usual mottling and pooling? Dunno. This man was so wounded, he was 4/5 dead before he was crucified. I would guess he was mottled because the scourging would cause deep bruising. But it could be that the bruises ran together and were coagulating when he died.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4RBXVs70_g
This one I'm not completely sold on. The Man on the Shroud has a broken, displaced nose and much swelling on the right side of the face--images based on the Shroud don't always account for what the unswollen face would look like.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAV36d7xosU
This is about the Sudarium, which is also quite interesting. Soaked up a lot of blood, probably from the obviously broken nose on the Man in the Shroud. There's still a lot on the Shroud.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dNy65pKZS34
Also worth a visit. The locals are very down to earth, and will tell you some stories if you are kind enough to listen with an open mind. A travel companion experienced a miracle when we were there. With that evidence, the physical stuff is beside the point.
And in addition the name of the person and where they were from is on the cloth; Jesus Nazareth
There's a ton of these on YouTube that imo are better presented. The evidence is
(1) Material and weaving of the Shroud. The main deboonker claims are based on carbon dating an edge piece,but that turned to be a Middle Ages repair strip that had been attached with French weaving to replace a worn edge. It was stained with tea to look older.
(2) Ancient pollen, from the Holy Land and everywhere the Shroud has been on its way to Turin.
(3) Unique dirt on the side facing the body where the nose and the knees of the Man in the Shroud hit the ground, as for instance from falling under a heavy weight and getting smashed onto the pavement.
(4) Bloodstains high in bilirubin, which comes from prolonged torture and preserves the red color forever.
(5) Historical accuracy. The Romans did crucify people, did this up to the 300s AD, and crucified at least 30,000. They didn't execute just anyone this way, but escaped slaves, traitors, rebels, and similar threats to their Deep State. There are existing nails from crucifixion. There were various ways to do it to prolong suffering.
Of all the evidence that the Man in the Shroud was Jesus, most is in the bloodstains. They tell that he was lashed with three types of whip; that the nails in his hands actually went through the wrists, although they could have been driven in on the hand side and come through the wrists in back.
They show he was stabbed between the 5th and 6th ribs with a particular type of Roman lance, hitting the heart and draining water from the pericardial sac and pulmonary edema, as well as blood.
They show the wounds from the crown of thorns which seems to have been an indignity ever given to only one man, and that the crown was not a wreath, but a cap type crown as was common in the Middle East. Also, the thorns in back were driven in much further, perhaps in the aforementioned fall.
The bloodstains on the face on the Shroud exactly match the ones on the Sudorium, the "napkin" that was neatly folded in the tomb. This extra cloth was a Jewish requirement for transporting a body with a disfigured face and not a regular funeral wrap, although nothing against leaving it on. The face image is not on it, ergo it was taken off and folded by the mourners before folding the Shroud.
There's so much more. The image is caused by oxidation of a layer thinner than a hair. It could easily be brushed off. One person calculated that this could be a done by a pulse of a billion watts of UV light for a billionth of a second, but I am not qualified to comment on that.
You have to consider everything you see on the internet as having come originally from a very few sources, whose voices are endlessly multiplied, and not get distracted by sheer numbers of reports. That said, the Shroud seems to have had quite a few serious investigators, more than a lot of other subjects.
This is long but covers many aspects. Fr. Dalton is actually a lecturer on the Shroud. Like most Catholics, he won't commit to saying this definitely wrapped Jesus. It has to be declared so by the Church, I guess. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HAbuG-oVq1Q
This is a very clear and concise, point-by-point, series about the Shroud. https://www.youtube.com/@ShrewdManagerChristianity
This is to me one of the most fascinating studies. The authors are talking about the energy that created the image coming from the long center axis of the body and being projected onto the Shroud. Now the body is not perfectly flat, see the 3d image, nor is the Shroud evenly draped over it. The image is strongest in the parts that are closest to the body. The authors of this video are saying that in the blurriness, they are seeing movement, like a stroboscope picture with little jerky gaps in it. A movie of Christ starting to move his hands. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xAVZp9tW5FU
Several efforts to recreate Jesus in 3d from the Shroud. In real life (or death) this body would be gray. Would it show the usual mottling and pooling? Dunno. This man was so wounded, he was 4/5 dead before he was crucified. I would guess he was mottled because the scourging would cause deep bruising. But it could be that the bruises ran together and were coagulating when he died. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4RBXVs70_g
This one I'm not completely sold on. The Man on the Shroud has a broken, displaced nose and much swelling on the right side of the face--images based on the Shroud don't always account for what the unswollen face would look like. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAV36d7xosU
This is about the Sudarium, which is also quite interesting. Soaked up a lot of blood, probably from the obviously broken nose on the Man in the Shroud. There's still a lot on the Shroud. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dNy65pKZS34
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2IMtYl_28k
Also worth a visit. The locals are very down to earth, and will tell you some stories if you are kind enough to listen with an open mind. A travel companion experienced a miracle when we were there. With that evidence, the physical stuff is beside the point.