”Corona immunity seroprevalence data (June/July 2022) shows that more than 98% of the Swiss population have antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. Due to the immunity situation, the currently predominant virus variants and the expected low virus circulation in spring/summer 2023, it can be assumed that people without risk factors have a very low risk of becoming seriously ill with covid-19 in spring/summer 2023.”
”For this reason, no recommendation for vaccination against covid-19 is formulated”.
https://petersweden.substack.com/p/bombshell-switzerland-stops-covid
Are you sure about this?
*The Swiss authorities have recommended that people aged over 16, especially the most vulnerable, get a Covid-19 booster shot to contain a new wave of infections expected this autumn and winter.
The Swiss authorities recommend that people aged over 16, especially the most vulnerable, get a Covid-19 booster shot to contain new infections this autumn and winter. In July the authorities recommended that over-80s and vulnerable people should get a second booster.
For anyone aged 16-64 without risk factors, a booster vaccination “makes sense after individual assessment… to reduce the risk of a serious and rare infection”, the Federal Office of Public Health said.*
https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/society/covid-19_coronavirus--the-situation-in-switzerland/45592192
One of these sites is bullshit...
OP’s site is just playing wording games.
Look at your text verrrrry closely. Notice how it states that you need vaccination for autumn and winter?
Now look at OP’s. Notice the specificity of no boosters being recommended for spring/summer 2023?
The 98% seroprevalence of antibodies is important and should be proof that natural immunity lasts as long if not longer than these “boosters.”
But the big thing here is that the substack claim that no vaccinations are recommended only applies to spring/summer 2023