The truth of the bodies we were given by the Creator of the heavens and the earth:
If you cut pieces off/out the bodily systems do not work as well or in ways intended-if we were made a certain way it was on purpose[principle of intelligent design]. Conversely if no foreskin is so much better, we would have been made without foreskin.
We were given immune systems that work if we live as intended.
Immune systems are impaired when parts are missing or broken-circumcision is genital mutilation and the reason they do it when you are a baby is so you have no choice
Circumcision is genital mutilation done when you are a child so you have no choice- parents do it because some one told them to [afraid of being different]. I certainly don't buy all this medical propaganda of preventing diseases that the medical community have actually instigated as bioweapons and never truly provide a cure for.
Our bodies as created are wonderful systems that heal themselves and defend themselves [immune system] if we live as intended. When parts are removed, what is left never quite works as intended. Believing in the need for circumcision is saying Creator made a mistake. Also look up penile shortening as a negative aspect of this genital mutilation. Proponents are literally reducing the size and effectiveness of your procreation organs.
Someone on reddit says it perfectly >>> The only reason the conclusion on the fairly obvious harm in destructive infant genital modification is not obvious to everyone is because the medical literature on the practice is dominated by the [statements] of circumcision enthusiasts.
Now think for a minute outside the box - as a man, is it better to be how you were made or to grow up and find out someone changed your male parts without your consent. Is it better to be whole or a slave to the agenda?
If you circumvent something you interfere with an event
so
If you circumcise something are you interfering with the size of something?
More seriously, if (as we have been told) circumcision is done for hygienic purposes and preventing disease, then they would also remove finger and toe nails completely because they build up scum. ..
I am not buying that story. It is done for control. Much like on a farm, certain animals have parts sniped to adjust their behavior. For control.
I would not be surprised if these sick bastards keep as many of the skins as they can, semi-alive, in special jars, in the secret (secrete) library of the Vatican. The skins become activated (quantum connection) when the person it belongs too is sexually excited. The sick fucks looooosh the energy from the population.
Go to the library and find a pre-1980s medical book with statistics and it states opposite, uncircumcised have far less STDs and other infections than the circumcised. It stated that the skin acted as a hood / barrier and gave better protection, as long as the male cleaned properly after sexual encounters.
The truth of the bodies we were given by the Creator of the heavens and the earth:
If you cut pieces off/out the bodily systems do not work as well or in ways intended-if we were made a certain way it was on purpose[principle of intelligent design]. Conversely if no foreskin is so much better, we would have been made without foreskin.
We were given immune systems that work if we live as intended.
Immune systems are impaired when parts are missing or broken-circumcision is genital mutilation and the reason they do it when you are a baby is so you have no choice
Circumcision is genital mutilation done when you are a child so you have no choice- parents do it because some one told them to [afraid of being different]. I certainly don't buy all this medical propaganda of preventing diseases that the medical community have actually instigated as bioweapons and never truly provide a cure for.
Our bodies as created are wonderful systems that heal themselves and defend themselves [immune system] if we live as intended. When parts are removed, what is left never quite works as intended. Believing in the need for circumcision is saying Creator made a mistake. Also look up penile shortening as a negative aspect of this genital mutilation. Proponents are literally reducing the size and effectiveness of your procreation organs.
Someone on reddit says it perfectly >>> The only reason the conclusion on the fairly obvious harm in destructive infant genital modification is not obvious to everyone is because the medical literature on the practice is dominated by the [statements] of circumcision enthusiasts.
Now think for a minute outside the box - as a man, is it better to be how you were made or to grow up and find out someone changed your male parts without your consent. Is it better to be whole or a slave to the agenda?
If you circumvent something you interfere with an event
so
If you circumcise something are you interfering with the size of something?
More seriously, if (as we have been told) circumcision is done for hygienic purposes and preventing disease, then they would also remove finger and toe nails completely because they build up scum. ..
I am not buying that story. It is done for control. Much like on a farm, certain animals have parts sniped to adjust their behavior. For control.
I would not be surprised if these sick bastards keep as many of the skins as they can, semi-alive, in special jars, in the secret (secrete) library of the Vatican. The skins become activated (quantum connection) when the person it belongs too is sexually excited. The sick fucks looooosh the energy from the population.
Go to the library and find a pre-1980s medical book with statistics and it states opposite, uncircumcised have far less STDs and other infections than the circumcised. It stated that the skin acted as a hood / barrier and gave better protection, as long as the male cleaned properly after sexual encounters.