Circumcision is genital mutilation done when you are a child so you have no choice- parents do it because some one told them to [afraid of being different]. I certainly don't buy all this medical propaganda of preventing diseases that the medical community have actually instigated as bioweapons and never truly provide a cure for.
Our bodies as created are wonderful systems that heal themselves and defend themselves [immune system] if we live as intended. When parts are removed, what is left never quite works as intended. Believing in the need for circumcision is saying Creator made a mistake. Also look up penile shortening as a negative aspect of this genital mutilation. Proponents are literally reducing the size and effectiveness of your procreation organs.
Someone on reddit says it perfectly >>> The only reason the conclusion on the fairly obvious harm in destructive infant genital modification is not obvious to everyone is because the medical literature on the practice is dominated by the [statements] of circumcision enthusiasts.
Now think for a minute outside the box - as a man, is it better to be how you were made or to grow up and find out someone changed your male parts without your consent. Is it better to be whole or a slave to the agenda?
Circumcision is genital mutilation done when you are a child so you have no choice- parents do it because some one told them to [afraid of being different]. I certainly don't buy all this medical propaganda of preventing diseases that the medical community have actually instigated as bioweapons and never truly provide a cure for.
Our bodies as created are wonderful systems that heal themselves and defend themselves [immune system] if we live as intended. When parts are removed, what is left never quite works as intended. Believing in the need for circumcision is saying Creator made a mistake. Also look up penile shortening as a negative aspect of this genital mutilation. Proponents are literally reducing the size and effectiveness of your procreation organs.
Someone on reddit says it perfectly >>> The only reason the conclusion on the fairly obvious harm in destructive infant genital modification is not obvious to everyone is because the medical literature on the practice is dominated by the [statements] of circumcision enthusiasts.
Now think for a minute outside the box - as a man, is it better to be how you were made or to grow up and find out someone changed your male parts without your consent. Is it better to be whole or a slave to the agenda?