Theory: If this is true, that biological nanobots are infecting our environment and our biology, it would seem that they operate (read/dictate) when we allow our vibes (resonances, impulses, foci--whatever you want to call them) to descend to a level of mediocrity and/or negativity. Thus, maybe a way to counter this attack is to engage in practices that detach us from that control.
For instance, I watched a young, red cardinal yesterday singing his song in the sycamore tree. My phone was not with me. I thought about his echoing sound, the regularized bursts of song, and the way he included or did not include the coda. Later that night I looked at Twitter and it tried to sell me an app to recognize bird songs--over and over. Robin and cardinal.
I sketch outside. This never occurs when I'm actively engaged in drawing trees, farms, etc. Is it something about the act of drawing that disengages the tech? Is there something about the passivity of the mere observational state that allows the nanotech to operate? Is it the sound? If the matrix is gathering information for its use, are there ways we can disengage it? Is this some of what the phrase "Ascension" means?
Wow. I’m thinking your observations are pretty good. Nature doesn’t lie, nature is truth. If nature shows is something we must take it as a truth even if we can’t immediately understand it. Does AI look at us the same? Can AI create on its own? Or does it need our creative ability to actually even function?
Theory: If this is true, that biological nanobots are infecting our environment and our biology, it would seem that they operate (read/dictate) when we allow our vibes (resonances, impulses, foci--whatever you want to call them) to descend to a level of mediocrity and/or negativity. Thus, maybe a way to counter this attack is to engage in practices that detach us from that control.
For instance, I watched a young, red cardinal yesterday singing his song in the sycamore tree. My phone was not with me. I thought about his echoing sound, the regularized bursts of song, and the way he included or did not include the coda. Later that night I looked at Twitter and it tried to sell me an app to recognize bird songs--over and over. Robin and cardinal.
I sketch outside. This never occurs when I'm actively engaged in drawing trees, farms, etc. Is it something about the act of drawing that disengages the tech? Is there something about the passivity of the mere observational state that allows the nanotech to operate? Is it the sound? If the matrix is gathering information for its use, are there ways we can disengage it? Is this some of what the phrase "Ascension" means?
Wow. I’m thinking your observations are pretty good. Nature doesn’t lie, nature is truth. If nature shows is something we must take it as a truth even if we can’t immediately understand it. Does AI look at us the same? Can AI create on its own? Or does it need our creative ability to actually even function?