Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness
🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government..." -Declaration of Independence
How do you guys feel about your Life, Liberty and pursuit of Happiness?
I dont feel free, and it dont make me feel too happy, but i still have my life
a) "I" was suggested by others to tempt "one" to claim self among other "ones", hence shaping the "I vs YOU" conflict.
b) "don't" aka "doing nothing" represents the suggested inversion of being (life) done by everything (inception towards death), hence being within a moving system.
c) feelings aka EMO'TION, noun [Latin emotio; emoveo, to move from.] tempts one to ignore being (life) moved by (inception towards death), hence ones need to resist wanted temptations like emotions.
d) self discernment can only be grown by one-self; like for example about being "free" will of choice within the "dom"inance of a balance based system aka free-dom....FREE (living) within DOM (process of dying).
e) what if your consent to use suggested words enslaves you to those suggesting them, while you ignore perceivable sound? Does nature use words to communicate itself or do those within nature shape suggestible words to describe perceivable nature?
a) does life; while being moved from inception towards death represent STILL; noun - "motionless" ?
b) can one within motion HAVE, verb - "to hold in possession or power" life or does the ongoing process of dying holds each temporary life within?
c) "my" represents once again a suggested claim by perceiving one (partial) within perceivable oneness (whole)...
Stop consenting
Life, while being moved from inception towards death, demands ones resistance within perceivable origin...not the pursuit of suggested outcomes.
Choice can only exists within balance, hence as "free" will of choice within the "dom"-inance of balance aka free-dom aka free (living) within dom (process of dying).
Others suggest "liberty" and if choice consents to the suggestions by the choice of another, then "free-dom" is being ignored for willingly putting oneself at liberty to another one. That's the origin of slavery; folks....
Consider if temporary self (perceiving) exists within ongoing evidence (perceivable), then ask yourself if the suggestions of others, sold as "evidence" could tempt one to ignore perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction)?
a) ...and by "all men" you refer to each different ONE of them?
b) being able to perceive (partial) perceivable (whole) implies temporary differences (living) within ongoing sameness (process of dying).
c) suggested creationism (implies out of nothing) tempts one to ignore perceivable transmutation (implies out of; within and in response to everything).
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death) represents the transmutation of temporary ingredient (growth) out of ongoing base (loss)...alchemy.
If mind/memory exists within setting, then input controls outcome. Input implies ones choice in-between need (perceivable inspiration) or want (suggested information). Consenting to suggested, while ignoring perceivable, gives others the power of ones consent to "govern ones mind".
IN (being within) DEPEND (sustained by) requires self discernment from each one within to DECLARE (to make clear).
Comprehension represents a clear mind/memory, while ignorance represents an obscured mind/memory.