The commies took over the website at the end of this old video..and if you go there now it basically saying all your income is taxable even being derived within the US.
This is what commies do. Probably forcefully bankrupted the original owners of the site and then changed it to their their own criminal purposes.
The misrepresentation and misapplication of the United States federal income tax constitutes the largest acquisition of wealth by way of deception in history.
Absolutely, but that means that, if anyone like Larken Rose widely disseminates a guess as to how to fix it, they go to jail to protect the scheme. Larken was crazy enough that they couldn't get him on a good evasion argument so they claimed to find porn on his computer, by which I think they meant his private photos of his wife.
Larken may be right that 861 is an evidence of the problem, but he makes that his whole argument (literally so often and ubiquitously that he becomes synonymous with "861") and then he acts as if he knows the remedy. I've never known his followers to obtain remedy.
So I say, pay the tax that applies to you. If someone testifies that a tax applies to you when it doesn't, the remedy is that you testify truthfully that it doesn't. Larken doesn't indicate he knows how to do this.
The commies took over the website at the end of this old video..and if you go there now it basically saying all your income is taxable even being derived within the US.
This is what commies do. Probably forcefully bankrupted the original owners of the site and then changed it to their their own criminal purposes.
Any video quality higher than the 80s?
Absolutely, but that means that, if anyone like Larken Rose widely disseminates a guess as to how to fix it, they go to jail to protect the scheme. Larken was crazy enough that they couldn't get him on a good evasion argument so they claimed to find porn on his computer, by which I think they meant his private photos of his wife.
Larken may be right that 861 is an evidence of the problem, but he makes that his whole argument (literally so often and ubiquitously that he becomes synonymous with "861") and then he acts as if he knows the remedy. I've never known his followers to obtain remedy.
So I say, pay the tax that applies to you. If someone testifies that a tax applies to you when it doesn't, the remedy is that you testify truthfully that it doesn't. Larken doesn't indicate he knows how to do this.