Trying to think outside the box here.

If members of Biden's cabinet entered into office knowing they planned to act unconstitutionally, this would make a plausible assumption they were protecting themselves from future charges of treason by failing to submit a valid oath of office.

If you never submitted a official oath of office, you essentially have not taken a pledge to fulfill their duties to the office in a constitutional manner. It would be impossible to charge them with treason. However, it could be argued that these public officials owed us their loyalty and failed, could this be misprision of treason?

Q may have indicated there are other charges to convict them with.

u/#q3900

Could all of these individuals who failed to submit a valid oath of office be forced to take a oath that is retroactive and if they fail to do so, then it is safe to say they know they were acting treasonously when they refuse to take a retroactive oath.

It appears that Lincoln administered a loyalty oath to prisoners of war after the civil war. It also seems that a retroactive clause was added is some situations.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loyalty_oath

We have 535 members in House and Senate. What if today, every member in the House and Senate today have failed to submit a valid oath of office. We may see many come forward and take a retroactive oath of office knowing that they have nothing to hide, however we may see many other who refuse because they know that treason charges may apply. They are immediately removed from office and prosecuted.

I guess I am wondering if there is a white hat plan that may be used in near future to weed out the bad from the good. The bad would refuse a retroactive loyalty oath and immediately create a red flag above their head.

What's your thoughts?

Stay safe my frens!!!

WWG1WGA!!!