Frens- My mom developed what looks like a small ball on the bottom of her eye over some months. It is partially in the waterline. She refused to go to the doctor for reasons we can all understand. The size of this ball was a bit smaller in diameter than the back of a pen, or a pencil eraser. It became reddened, and started getting painful. She decides to go see her doctor. Doctor says it's cancer, and refers her to a specialist which she's still waiting to see. I asked her if she would like to try Ivermectin, and MMS while she waits. (If that failed then I was going to have her try fenbendazole.) She says yes.
I saw her today and couldn't believe my eyes. I don't think she could either. It's been a week and a half. The size of this mass is 1/2 what it was, no longer red or painful. This improvement was reached with (1) dose of Ivermectin according to her bodyweight, per day, and 2 drop doses of MMS 1-2x per day. She is taking it slow because I don't think she had a lot of faith it would do anything. Because she's taking both the Ivermectin and the MMS (internally and applied topically), I can't say 100% it's one over the other. But I can tell you I've never seen anything work so fast in my life. We don't know what the industry standard treatment protocol is for something like this. We assumed it would be some kind of cutting or radiation which she doesn't want.
We wanted to take before and after pictures, and we wanted to tell her doctor, but decided against it. Dr's simply can't be trusted anymore. I'm going to take a picture of it for our own before and after to put in our own medical reference manual. She's going to stay on it another week, then take a week break, then start again. Her appointment is at the end of May. I told her if we continue to see improvement we can reschedule the appointment, and give this a little more time to work. If/When it goes away she's planning on going to the dr for a follow up to see what he says. I thought you should know.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but chemically speaking, isn't MMS essentially just pool water? That's not to denigrate its effectiveness in any way (consider summers in the sun with all that vitamin D and all that chlorine water--you ever remember getting sick? I don't. In fact, I remember being sick until I went swimming and then the next day...gone). But isn't that basically what we're looking at there? Pool water?
I believe the chemical compound is actually different than what would go in the pool.
No, it's not, but it does smell similar.
MMS CDS Dr Andreas Kalcker excellent website on MMS CDS https://andreaskalcker.com/en/cds-clo2.html
The therapeutic action of chlorine dioxide is given by its selectivity for pH. This means that this molecule dissociates and releases oxygen when it comes into contact with another acid. When it reacts, it becomes sodium chloride (common salt) and at the same time releases oxygen, which in turn oxidizes (burns) the pathogens (harmful germs) of acidic pH present, converting them into alkaline oxides (“ashes”).
Therefore, when chlorine dioxide dissociates, oxygen is released into the blood, as do erythrocytes (red blood cells) through the same principle (known as the Bohr effect), which is to be selective for acidity. Like blood, chlorine dioxide releases oxygen when it is acidic, either from lactic acid or from the acidity of the pathogen.
Its therapeutic effect is due -among others- to the fact that it helps in the recovery of many types of diseases by creating an alkaline environment, while eliminating small acid pathogens, according to my criteria, through oxidation, with an impossible electromagnetic overload. to dissipate by unicellular organisms.
Multicellular tissue, due to its larger size, has a better capacity to dissipate this charge and is not affected in the same way. Biochemistry in turn defines cellular protection through glutathione in cells.
What is CDS? CDS is a concentrated aqueous solution of 0,3% (3000ppm) of chlorine dioxide gas, with no sodium chlorite (NaClO2) content in the solution and has a neutral pH.
10ml is diluted with 1 liter of water obtaining 0,003% (30ppm) in 10 shots of 100ml every hour as a daily dose. (= 3mg ClO2 per dose)
What is MMS? MMS is the mixture of sodium chlorite (NaClO2) activated with citric acid that contains sodium chlorite and is of acidic pH. MMS It is the name Jim Humble gave to the mixture of sodium chlorite (NaClO2) activated with citric acid at the time. It works excellent for many illnesses, but there is a stomach reaction and it can cause diarrhea as a side effect and its taste is unpleasant for many. It is the basis for manufacturing CDS
What is CD? CD is a more advanced form of MMS. It is the mixture of sodium chlorite (NaClO2) activated with hydrochloric acid that contains sodium chlorite and has an acidic pH. It is better in taste and can be useful for its easy transport but it has a secondary stomach reaction. It is the basis for manufacturing CDS
What is ClO2, Chlorine Dioxide? Chlorine dioxide is just the gas from the reaction of sodium chlorite (NaClO2) activated with an acid, which is very soluble in water and evaporates at 11 ° C
Ok so different compounds, technically. Measured impact on health factors significantly different? And how do they both compare to hydrogen peroxide?
Dr Andreas has videos and a webpage, a link to make concentrate and testimonials.
https://www.scotmas.com/chlorine-dioxide/why-is-clo2-different-to-chlorine.aspx?locale=en While chlorine dioxide has “chlorine” in its name, its chemistry is radically different from that of chlorine. As we all learned in high school chemistry, we can mix two compounds and create a third that bears little resemblance to its parents. For instance, by mixing two parts of hydrogen gas with one of oxygen - liquid water is the formed. We should not be misled by the fact that chlorine and chlorine dioxide share a word in common. The chemistries of the two compounds are completely different.
Chlorine and chlorine dioxide are both oxidising agents (electron receivers). However, chlorine has the capacity to take in two electrons, whereas chlorine dioxide can absorb five. This means that, mole for mole, ClO2 is 2.6 times more effective than chlorine.
Bar Cl2 Clo2 Comparison
If equal, if not greater importance is the fact that chlorine dioxide will not react with many organic compounds, and as a result ClO2 does not produce environmentally dangerous chlorinated organics. For example; aromatic compounds have carbon atoms arranged in rings and they may have other atoms, such as chlorine, attached to these rings, to form a chlorinated aromatic - a highly toxic compound that persists in the environment long after it is produced.
Chlorine dioxide's behaviour as an oxidising agent is quite dissimilar. Like ozone, the predominant oxidation reaction mechanism for chlorine dioxide proceeds through a process known as free radical electrophilic (i.e. electron-attracting) abstraction rather than by oxidative substitution or addition (as in chlorinating agents such as chlorine or hypochlorite). This means that chlorinated organic compounds such as THMs and HAAs are not produced as a result of disinfection using chlorine dioxide