Not completely over the target, 18,000 conscripts, 18,000 in rotational training. 180,000 force overall strength. Besides, our history and heritage is that if Finlands borders are crossed we will volunteer, be it against Nazis or digusting Commies. Doesn't matter.
Finlands forces are among the thoughest around the world. But I don't want to see more brother wars in Europe. The Finns will not surrender for hundreds of years.
But it's important to have higher IQ, and understand the difference between tactical war heads, and strategical war heads.
The tactical nukes on the battlefield would be launched from behind the front lines and destroy the upfront resistance and supply lines.
The strategical nukes would be from Kaliningrad or even from the polar region stationed sub marines, or hypersonics and there's 0.0000% chance of interception with minutes response time/forewarning. Especially Kaliningrad or deployed submarines. This would erase heritage and history, and since both Finland and Sweden have more or less sold out to the cabal and dismantled industrial sector and is 90-95% service/tech-fin economies concentrated at the Capitols. The country would never recover, and all savings/liquidity/investments lost which would erase the rest of the population over time even if they survive initial contact.
Which is what we will see in Ukraine, if not cooler heads prevails. If Russia wants to, which they don't. The battlefield could be won whenever tactical nukes are used on the battlefield. Forcing diplomatic talks.
And Russia IS NOT in full scale war in Ukraine yet, it's still in Special Military Operations stage. We have seen nothing of their War capabilities and Putin even stated this in speeches.
Tactically there's no need to escalate from SMO. Russia can handle Ukraine with special operations. But if NATO forces enters with full force, we're at full scale war. Which is much different than people can imagine. Especially normies.
Not completely over the target, 18,000 conscripts, 18,000 in rotational training. 180,000 force overall strength. Besides, our history and heritage is that if Finlands borders are crossed we will volunteer, be it against Nazis or digusting Commies. Doesn't matter.
Finlands forces are among the thoughest around the world. But I don't want to see more brother wars in Europe. The Finns will not surrender for hundreds of years.
But it's important to have higher IQ, and understand the difference between tactical war heads, and strategical war heads.
The tactical nukes on the battlefield would be launched from behind the front lines and destroy the upfront resistance and supply lines.
The strategical nukes would be from Kaliningrad or even from the polar region stationed sub marines, or hypersonics and there's 0.0000% chance of interception with minutes response time/forewarning. Especially Kaliningrad or deployed submarines. This would erase heritage and history, and since both Finland and Sweden have more or less sold out to the cabal and dismantled industrial sector and is 90-95% service/tech-fin economies concentrated at the Capitols. The country would never recover, and all savings/liquidity/investments lost which would erase the rest of the population over time even if they survive initial contact.
Which is what we will see in Ukraine, if not cooler heads prevails. If Russia wants to, which they don't. The battlefield could be won whenever tactical nukes are used on the battlefield. Forcing diplomatic talks.
And Russia IS NOT in full scale war in Ukraine yet, it's still in Special Military Operations stage. We have seen nothing of their War capabilities and Putin even stated this in speeches.
Tactically there's no need to escalate from SMO. Russia can handle Ukraine with special operations. But if NATO forces enters with full force, we're at full scale war. Which is much different than people can imagine. Especially normies.