Dylan Eleven (did this test himself I believe)
We have posted several articles on testing the vaccinated for a bluetooth signal using an android phone switched into developer mode. iPhones were not so easy until I found an App called BLE Scanner 4.0.
I have just tested and app on an iPhone without switching into developer mode and successfully picked up the signals from the vaccinated using this App.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
My Tests and Results
• BLE Scanner 4.0 downloaded from the Apple app store on an iPhone XR, software version 14.2.
• Inside a large Faraday cage 20 feet x 20 feet, with no wireless radiation present at all.
• Tested extensively with BLE Scanner App, found no signals at all.
• Tested extensively with high-end wireless radiation tester that picks up Bluetooth wifi and cellular signals; found no signals at all.
• Tested the area with 5 different unvaccinated people and the BLE Scanner app showed no signals at all.
• Tested the environment with the BLE Scanner App with 3 vaccinated people, found 4 bluetooth signals. All signals listed as N/A name not available. Each person had no bluetooth devices on them, air tags, watches or phones etc.
• Did extensive testing on distance from the subjects, showed clear relationship between the signal and distance to each person. The app shows the distance of each signal -25 very close to -60 futher away.
• Tested with 3 different vaccinated people found 6 signals.
• Tested with all 6 vaccinated people together and found 10 signals.
• Tested distances and removing people, direct correlation in the app.
It seems that some of the people were emitting only one signal and others more than one.
The vaccinated signal had a N/A for the name.
As a control I tried the app outside the Faraday cage in different locations and picked up several devices, Samsung TVs etc, and lots of N/A (name not available) which in my experiments were the vaccinated.
Try downloading BLE Scanner 4.0 on your iPhone and do your own tests.
Says everything.
It's not possible. There is no instance of a bluetooth device working at that scale, that is small enough to fit through a vaccination needle.
I understand that you're going for the whole "anything is possible, we don't know what exists yet" angle, but I work with bluetooth technology professionally. I'm not just some "average person." It needs to be powered on to constantly be broadcasting a signal, and they just don't make bluetooth chips that small.
Is there more evidence than just stories like OP that have no verification?
Haha
"I work with bluetooth you're wrong and that says everything."
Never heard that one before from internet randoms.
Okay thanks.
I will put that in my opinions that don't matter stack.
It doesn't say everything just because I work with bluetooth, but there is also no evidence of it existing. No patents, no pictures, nothing. Just stories you read.
If it exists, what is the tech powering it? Who makes it?
Why aren't there any imitations?
Graphene-based plasmonic antennas. Unlike plasmonic antennas based on noble metals, these would allow smart dust to operate at frequencies at least 100 times (and in principle perhaps 1000 times) smaller than is possible using a conventional metallic antenna.
The operating principle is that an electromagnetic (EM) wave directed onto a graphene surface perpendicular to that surface excites the electrons in the graphene into oscillations. These electrons interact with those in the dielectric material on which the graphene is mounted, thereby forming surface plasmon polaritons (SPP).
When the antenna becomes resonant (meaning that an integral number of SPP wavelengths fit into the physical dimensions of the graphene), the coupling of the SPP and the external EM waves increases greatly, resulting in efficient transfer of energy between the two.
I looked up some information on this! Interesting stuff really. Unfortunately size constraints means it can't function at a level that you're proposing, where unique signatures can be broadcasted over a set range.
It can be capable of passive data transmission, but not active data transmission (which is what bluetooth is).