Moon landing doubts
(www.thegatewaypundit.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (62)
sorted by:
This is nonsense. Q said it was nonsense. I've seen the photos of the landing sights from lunar orbital satellites. I've seen the previous unmanned lander Ranger(?) that one of the missions visited. We use the reflectors for laser testing distance.
I wouldn't say it's nonsense. Once you really look into it, it just doesn't hold up. They're isn't even a blast crater for the lunar lander and no dust. There are also light sources coming from many directions. Also, the fact that they can't do it anymore. Too much for a discussion here. There are physical remnants but doesn't mean they traveled to the moon.
Also, Q is a human being or beings who may have the best intentions for humanity but they too can commit mistakes. No reason they should become dogma.
Light sources...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O9y_AVYMEUs
Those Van Allen belts are worth avoiding... Check this TedX talk, around the 10m mark to talk about "The Prehistoric Alignment of World Wonders" equator that was first noticed by researcher Jim Alison. Take a look at this, really neat. WOW, IT WAS A 2-DAY ORBIT, and it explains a lot.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_HytJn6uaRk
I checked out the one on light sources. While nicely done and compelling, it doesn't address some photos with perpendicular shadows. All shadows should be parallel and Neil Armstrong only serves as a reflector fill in light. Not enough to create a strong perpendicular shadow. Also some photos out there with hot spots directly behind the astronaut. Sun is too big to create a hot spot. I do agree though that we shouldn't be able to see stars.
Fun fact --- you can bounce lasers off the moon without reflectors.
1962 ("landing" was 1969)
https://inshorts.com/en/news/earthmoon-distance-was-measured-by-bouncing-lasers-off-moon-1525878202869
Interesting that NASA pushes the reflectors as a proof....
'funner' fact. This was done in 1969-73 using 1969 technology. Less spread, more precise readings that, as an example, is used to show such things as the distance between the moon and the earth is increasing by 1.5 inches/year.
Q said disinfo is necessary too.
We have crossed the threshold of unlimited CGI ---- nothing is provable or un-provable.