This is a great 1hr long interview with Donald Trump Jr and Col. MacGregor. Embedding has been disabled, so you'll need to click the link. (MacGregor only posts on YT, sorry)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=osIctttStQU
Here is a shorter video, where he says the same thing:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bXsmm0m2TqI
As always, MacGregor straight talks about the history and inevitable outcome in Ukraine. They are going to lose. NATO goaded RUS into war.
More interesting, he stated that: "This war is now becoming a financial war. You have the St. Petersburg Forum next week. Or next month in June. They are expecting 81 nations to come in [to BRICS]. The purpose of this for is to consolidate support for the emergence of a new currency; of a non western world. [...] So these people are showing up and they are going to support this GOLD BACKED SYSTEM."
That should sound very familiar to anons:
It should be easy to visualize all the chess pieces moving into position now. Check mate is inevitable. 2024 is the final act. The beginning of the end. Agenda 47. Destroy the deep state. Destroy the fed. Destroy the cabal.
there are 5 Countries that have joined BRICS, not 81.
BRICS describes the first five regions who formed the alliance.
And those 61 countries having a meeting, are investigating a pathway to join.
19 countries have already (formally and informally) expressed an interest in joining.
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/rest-of-world/19-countries-express-interest-in-joining-brics-group/articleshow/99756285.cms?from=mdr#:~:text=Other%20countries%20that%20have%20expressed,which%20he%20didn't%20identify.
To be more clear I provided a direct quote.
right, as OP just posted he changed it to "there are now 81 countries that have joined with BRICS"
You’re getting lost in the weeds. The point is not who is formally part of BRICS. The point is, 81+ countries are moving towards a gold backed currency.
gotta love how people often get hung up on one small misstated irrelevant detail and use that as evidence to throw the entire point away. this is often a tactic of the left.
I understood that, my point was that the Original poster first stated it differently, and now corrected it. It was easily missunderstood, now its clear. One little word changes a lot. Thx