Question about 2A
🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (33)
sorted by:
Certainly, but the pogroms came before the advent of the Information Age. In the political conflict between patriots and globalists, guns are not the threat — information is.
During the height of COVID, for example, China welded people’s doors, but America glued its citizens’ eyes to CNN.
I’m not trying to rag on you or anyone else in this thread. I love pro-gun rhetoric as much as the next guy; I just want to be sure my rhetoric matches the current reality.
Without the guns the pograms would come regardless of the information age. They don't give a shit if every last person knows when they don't have any means to put a stop to them.
I suppose the only conclusion I can draw is that Australia, Britain, etc. aren’t disarmed, despite what the memes say. That’s good news, if so.
I guess from the tone of all your replies, you are advocating that America should just give up and join Britain and Australia.
Its not going to happen, but don't stop trying.
You’ve misunderstood me, friend. I own quite a few firearms, and I hope the English and Aussies can too.
My question was about whether old pro-gun rhetoric (framed in the context of 2A) still holds true in the age where battles for the soul of the nation take place on TV and the Internet.
No animosity here, friend. :) Hope your day is blessed.