A very interesting read. Essentially he had no idea what to make of the data, arbitrarily decided it was meaningless, and then collected 5 mil off Lindell over the technicality that the 'date modified' metadata reported it had been "modified" days before the start of the contest. Of course, he neglects to mention that this would happen upon any conversion of the data from one format to another, and does not keep track of whether the actual content of the data has been modified.
Pretty shoddy work for a supposed cybersecurity expert, but then again, I would probably also try to win on any technicality that I possibly could.
Doesn't read like a humble guy trying to win a contest... nor like a cybersecurity expert analyzing a national security issue... average leftist hitpiece hubris
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2023/05/26/my-pillow-mike-lindell-investigation-00097903
Minutes 17:20 to 20:00 ish may explain about the lackluster data: https://rumble.com/vmjuoo-dr-franks-presentation-at-washington-election-integrity-public-hearing.html