The current "state of the debate" between pro-vaccines, verses anti-vaccine,
Has devolved into an endless loop of allegations and denials.
For example, Steve Kirsch has recently been red pilling himself and others, by discovering several new "proofs" that vaccines cause SIDS, and autism.
But the problem becomes this...
How many different ways can we already PROVE the Pythagorean theorem, before we are sufficiently convinced that its true?
The same with vaccines. How many times can we PROVE that vaccines cause SIDS, or AUTISM, before we are sufficiently convinced that it is true?
And so the debate has devolved into a back-and-forth of people saying that vaccines DO cause autism, and other people saying that vaccines DO NOT cause autism.
It has boiled down into a binary debate, of YES-NO-YES-NO 1-0-1-0...
And at this point, a person could go looking for "studies" that prove it one way or another, and most people will just accept cheap and easy answers.
anyone can prove it one way or another, to satisfy themselves that they are correct.
so now what?
like any revolution, there are 2 necessary steps:
-
educate yourself
-
educate others
instead of arguing about 100 studies say this, or that,
we need to be working on educating ourselves on how vaccines really work,
and also on how it is that vaccines are able to cause such a wide variety of adverse reactions.
and we educate ourselves with new models for understating vaccines.
and then we educate others, by sharing these new models, and integrating these models into your own talking points, and arguments, in the future.
in no particular order, here are several new vaccine models that i hope you will be able to integrate into your own understandings, and help others understand as well.
VACCINES CAUSE HIGH FEVER
-
vaccines cause high fever. measurable by thermometer.
-
vaccines cause redness and swelling around the injection site. inflammation.
-
high fevers cause damage to organs, tissues, proteins, genes, and DNA
-
fried egg model. this is your brain. this is your brain ON VACCINES
-
vaccines cause gene mutation, diagnosed later as Dravet syndrome
-
vaccine-fever induced Dravet is when a gene mutation results in the brain cells not being able to intake sodium, which is required for proper brain cell function.
-
Sodium is an electrolyte, and for every electrolyte there is a "channel" on the cell wall, that will allow only certain (electrolyte) into the cell.
-
the Heart requires calcium, which is another electrolyte.
-
Muscle cells require Potassium, which is another electrolyte.
-
So, depending on HOW HIGH the Fever got, and for HOW LONG, and WHERE on the body, you may see localized de novo gene mutation, which can express itself in a wide "spectrum" of ways.
-
its essential to have an introduction to "protein folding"
TED talks: 16 minute video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zm-3kovWpNQ
https://twitter.com/VaxxCauseSIDS/status/1661160896536670209
this is a fundamental and essential vaccine model !!!
this is what i mean, by pushing out "alternative" models of understanding,
because once people have these new models inside their heads, it will affect how they view everything in the future.
we aren't trying to win a meaningless debate that will be forgotten tomorrow.
we are trying to fundamentally change how the next generation of lay people understand vaccines
The thing what woke me up about vaccines is a book by Gary Matsumoto titled Vaccine-A. In it, he proves that Gulf War Syndrome is caused by one of the adjuvants used in the anthrax vaccine. Spoiler: the toxic adjuvant is squalene (pronounced skway-leen).
In the book, he explains in lay terms how the vaccines are made and how they are tested.
One of the big testing scams is they inject the control group with adjuvants, instead of saline. Then when both groups have side-effects, they say they don't count because both the test and control groups got them. Fuckers.
this is another excellent example of a vaccine model !!!
vaccine "science" is smoke and mirrors. witchcraft.
what they will do, to supposedly "test" a hypothesis,
is to have the supposed "placebo" be the exact same vaccine, minus the suspected "active ingredient", and compare outcomes.
the problem is, they might "accidentally-on-purpose" decide to test the WRONG "active ingredient",
for example,
they might test (the admittedly highly plausible) hypothesis of THIMEROSAL being the active ingredient that causes autism,
when in fact the REAL active ingredient was the ALUMINUM ADJUVANT,
then the declare the entire vaccine is safe, because they "can't find the evidence" that a certain ingredient causes a certain problem