"AGREEMENT between the Department of Defense of the United States of America and the Ministry of Health of Ukraine Concerning Cooperation in the Area of Prevention of Proliferation of Technology, Pathogens and Expertise that could be Used in the Development of · Biological Weapons"
Uh, it looks to me like this treaty is to prevent the proliferation of pathogens and bio weapons, not fund them. Am I missing something here???
All those armed drones that can track footsteps and have facial recognition that we deploy in foreign countries are for defense, obviously — we know this because they’re funded by the department of DEFENSE. The government wouldn’t ever misrepresent aggression as defense, right? RIGHT?
If you have to develop the weapons in order to prevent them, what’s the difference?
A direct link to download PDF
https://t.co/lzlyFmUSi4
Batting 1000 here...
"AGREEMENT between the Department of Defense of the United States of America and the Ministry of Health of Ukraine Concerning Cooperation in the Area of Prevention of Proliferation of Technology, Pathogens and Expertise that could be Used in the Development of · Biological Weapons"
Uh, it looks to me like this treaty is to prevent the proliferation of pathogens and bio weapons, not fund them. Am I missing something here???
All those armed drones that can track footsteps and have facial recognition that we deploy in foreign countries are for defense, obviously — we know this because they’re funded by the department of DEFENSE. The government wouldn’t ever misrepresent aggression as defense, right? RIGHT?
If you have to develop the weapons in order to prevent them, what’s the difference?