And to you and yours. I'm sorry I over-reacted to your question, it just seemed to me, at the time, that it was an affront to my intellect. So yes, you're right about weighing and discerning truth out of bias. Looking for such bias in articles is my go-to position on everything I read. I just found the bias on that article a bit thick, making me suspect the entire article... at first.
I don't doubt that the SEE EYE EH are in bed with some very disreputable people and that they do some pretty disreputable things. No, I don't trust them to be working for America's best interests.
But the information war continues. Thanks for your civil response. Good anons can still agree to disagree and remain amicable about it.
And to you and yours. I'm sorry I over-reacted to your question, it just seemed to me, at the time, that it was an affront to my intellect. So yes, you're right about weighing and discerning truth out of bias. Looking for such bias in articles is my go-to position on everything I read. I just found the bias on that article a bit thick, making me suspect the entire article... at first.
I don't doubt that the SEE EYE EH are in bed with some very disreputable people and that they do some pretty disreputable things. No, I don't trust them to be working for America's best interests.
But the information war continues. Thanks for your civil response. Good anons can still agree to disagree and remain amicable about it.