This schould be researched more deeply, please help as I have not so much time for now - Thank you frens, for your input and sharing of this smoking gun.
ALSO think Epstein regarding this, because his of connections to the scientific world, blackmail of governments and politicians etc.
So imagine there is this Bill Gates, founder of Microsoft, meeting with a German highranking scientist in 2005 and then the big funding for all things related to this start.
In 2005 Bill Gates met Wolfgang Wahlster "Inventor of Industry 4.0", who has also expertise or scientific connections in medicine and neuro science.
https://www.wolfgang-wahlster.de/mediathek/photogalerie/wahlster_gates/?lang=en
https://www.wolfgang-wahlster.de/wissenschaftliche-vita/?lang=en
And also imagine there is curAton, a project of Wolfgang Wahlster working together with the founder of Bionthech and TRONGmbH!
Scroll down for it: https://curatime.org/en/about-us
https://tron-mainz.de/science-in-translation
TRON´s mission is to bridge the gap between fundamental science at universities and market-oriented research in the pharmaceutical industry. We turn innovative scientific concepts into treatments ready for clinical testing, thereby accelerating the translation of discoveries into progress for patients.
Target Discovery and Validation
Personalized Therapy Development
Preclinical RNA Vaccine Development
Cellular Therapy Development
Wolfgang Wahlster's wiki is only in German language quite impressive, the English one is very short.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfgang_Wahlster
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfgang_Wahlster#Leben_und_Karriere
In the German wiki there is also a list which states also his experience/networking in medicine, neuro, thomboses!!!
Only DE, but look for "Thromboses", also activities in China:
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfgang_Wahlster#Auszeichnungen_und_Ehrungen
Here his work in the medical field in EN: https://curatime.org/en/about-us
https://www.oecd.org/futures/35391171.pdf
https://www.dfki.de/en/web/news/ten-years-of-industrie-4-0-interview-wolfgang-wahlster-cea-dfki
In January 2011, the Research Alliance determined that a future project titled “INDUSTRIE 4.0: Germany as the lead provider of cyber-physical systems by 2020” should be developed. Although the acatech study at the time, directed by our colleague Manfred Broy, identified many important application areas, Mr. Kagermann, Mr. Lukas, and I chose to focus on applications in the manufacturing industry – a good decision, as evidenced by the success of INDUSTRIE 4.0.The opening event of the Hannover Messe on April 3, 2011 was attended by the Chancellor Angela Merkel, numerous politicians, and approximately 3,000 industry leaders, and I was able to introduce the term “Industrie 4.0” for the first time to important decision-makers in my speech regarding the work of the Hermes Award jury.
At the opening event of the Hannover Messe on April 3, 2011, in the presence of the Chancellor Angela Merkel, numerous politicians and around 3,000 executives, I was then able to present the term „INDUSTRIE 4.0" for the first time to important decision-makers in my speech on the jury work for the Hermes Award: “To remain a center of manufacturing today implies becoming fit for the 4th Industrial Revolution which is powered by the Internet. The Internet of Things establishes a bridge be-tween the virtual and tangible worlds. For industrial manufacturing, this approach represents a paradigm shift. An unfinished product controls its own production processes, monitors the relevant environmental parameters using embedded sensors, and initiates the appropriate corrective actions in the event of a malfunction – all simultaneously as an observer and an actor...”
https://ricaip.eu/prof-wolfgang-wahlster-on-industrie-4-0/
In December 2010, at a meeting at the German Academy of Science and Engineering (acatech) in Berlin where I met the colleagues Henning Kagermann and Wolf-Dieter Lukas, I suggested that the future project be named “Industry 4.0”. The designation “4.0” heralds the fourth industrial revolution and at the same time gives an indication of the important future role of software through the type of version designation known in IT. On April 1, 2011, our first article on Industry 4.0 appeared in VDI-Nachrichten, Germany’s leading business weekly on industry and engineering, with the title “Industry 4.0: With the Internet of Things on the Way to the Fourth Industrial Revolution”. On June 15, 2011, I distributed my graphic on the four stages of industrial revolutions for the first time on the Internet, which was then translated and adapted by thousands of colleagues worldwide. The intuitively understandable graphics undoubtedly contributed to the rapid spread of the term “Industry 4.0”. The global triumphal procession of the term also led to the fact that in many countries the German spelling “Industrie 4.0” is still used correctly today.
Yes, in specifying the characteristics for Industry 4.0, we were able to build on concrete research results from DFKI, which have been developed since 2005 in our world’s first Smart Factory in Kaiserslautern.
Page 129: https://www.oecd.org/futures/35391171.pdf
"Some would say that this is happening because the traditional political pro-cess does not work anymore. The feedback between the electorate and the politicians is becoming weaker. Politicians are being pulled away from the voter because he or she needs to be near the power centre, and in some cases this is international. Thus, the emergence of the market mechanisms as a channel for political expression is another consequence of the dichotomy between the élite and the majority of the population. The majority and/or grassroots are not heard by the traditional political hearing aids.
They then seek other ways and other channels toinfluence decisions of importance to them and their daily lives. And this channel isto go directly to enterprises and to push them toward the “right” behaviour.This is natural because what we see emerging is the political enterprise. Intoday’s world very few enterprises can exist, never mind expand, without becomingmore and more political. This does not mean party politics in the traditional sensebut political in the sense of showing the way ahead and putting forward ideas, eth-ical values and positions vis-à-vis the problems.
The key point is that ethical leadership is gradually being moved away from thepolitical game as we used to know it and to the pitch of the large enterprises. Whois most important for the destiny of citizens in a middle-sized European or Asiannation state: its Prime Minister, or Bill Gates, or Rupert Murdoch? The answer is nolonger self-evident. So what do we do to channel our views to this mighty person orthis mighty enterprise?
The world's worst people live too damn long.
Ain’t it the truth!