So, we now have incontrovertible proof that it was.... TREASON. - The Great Awakening

584

So, we now have incontrovertible proof that it was.... TREASON. (media.patriots.win) - N C S W I C -

posted 1 year ago by catsfive 1 year ago by catsfive +584 / -0

64 comments download

64 comments share download save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (64)

sorted by:

▲ 3 ▼

– GopherEverett 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Ooh, I've never thought about the Truman vs. Dewey election before. Dewey was projected to win that one based on the polling, according to my based high school US history teacher.

Knowing what we know now...

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 4 ▼

– TheMoreYouKnowOkay 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Crooked was also projected to win.

Projected to win doesn't mean anything. Focus more on what masses of people are doing.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 4 ▼

– GopherEverett 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Correct, yes, but now that we know what their cheating mechanisms are, there are some interesting questions I've got now regarding the Truman election:

Was Dewey like their Hillary, where they were trying to project him into the WH only for the people to speak up?
Or, was Dewey the true winner until a 3am ballot drop happened? This happened with the JFK/Nixon election as well with a ballot drop in Chicago "fortifying" the election for JFK. Could they have done something similar with Truman first to see if it would work and the local newspapers were unaware?

I'm leaning towards 1, but keeping 2 in the back of my mind.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 4 ▼

– TheMoreYouKnowOkay 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

These are questions to ask every election.

Regarding JFK/Nixon, was there a 3AM ballot drop? I heard they literally just had people voting multiple times all over the state. Vote early, vote often.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q